Thursday, May 25, 2017

Obama Spied on Conservatives starting 2011-2012. It started then. Justice Department must investigate NOW!

THE SNOOPING STARTED IN 2011
THEY ACTED WITH IMPUNITY.
THE OBAMA CABAL WEAPONIZED THE IRS THE NSA THE COURTS TO FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA. THEY WERE RELENTLESS.
.. IN




Yes 2011...National Security Agency’s incidental intercepts of Americans, taking advantage of rules their boss relaxed started in 2011. They claimed it was to help the government better fight terrorism, espionage by foreign enemies and hacking threats.

Hidden in this "noble agenda" was the real reason they did it.
TO SPY ON THEIR POLITICAL ENEMIES!
2011  It started in 2011... peel back the Onion.. Insidrs are leaking to us that the Obama Cabal with the same cast of characters spied on Romney and Ryan. 



Those poor fools did not know why they were one step behind on all issues!


They blackmailed the both of them. Paul Ryan is still being blackmailed. Now you can figure why Romney slunk away after FRAUD WAS EXPOSED IN THE 2012 OBAMA VOTE RIGGING. THEY HAD SHIT ON THIS SORRY AS MAN SHITT ROMNEY!

Those intelligence reports identified Americans who were directly intercepted talking to foreign sources or were the subject of conversations between two or more monitored foreign figures. Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

News agencies who are not afraid to talk the Truth have reported facts:








Circa news http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas-team-secretly-disclosed-years-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

Reports leaked show that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011. NOW YOU KNOW WHY!!
Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.
GUESS WHAT HAPPENED IN 2011? Obama Campaign for reelection. THEY TARGETED MITT ROMNEY AND PAUL RYAN;



The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true.
“Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702,” the unsealed court ruling declared. “The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries inviolation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

Speaking Wednesday on Fox News, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said there was an apparent effort under the Obama Administration to increase the number of unmaskings of Americans.
"If we determine this to be true, this is an enormous abuse of power," Paul said. “This will dwarf all other stories.”
“There are hundreds and hundreds of people,” Paul added.
The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.
“I think what this emphasizes is the shocking lack of oversight of these programs,” said Neema Singh Guliani, the ACLU’s legislative counsel in Washington. 
“You have these problems going on for years that only come to the attention of the court late in the game and then it takes additional years to change its practices.
“I think it does call into question all those defenses that we kept hearing, that we always have a robust oversight structure and we have culture of adherence to privacy standards,” she added. “And the headline now is they actually haven’t been in compliacne for years and the FISA court itself says in its opinion is that the NSA suffers from a culture of a lack of candor.”
The NSA acknowledged it self-disclosed the mass violations to the court last fall and that in April it took the extraordinary step of suspending the type of searches that were violating the rules, even deleting prior collected data on Americans to avoid any further violations.
“NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target,” the agency said in the statement that was dated April 28 and placed on its Web site without capturing much media or congressional attention.
In question is the collection of what is known as upstream “about data”about an American that is collected even though they were not directly in contact with a foreigner that the NSA was legally allowed to intercept.
The NSA said it doesn't have the ability to stop collecting ‘about’ information on Americans, “without losing some other important data. ” It, however, said it would stop the practice to “reduce the chance that it would acquire communication of U.S. persons or others who are not in direct contact with a foreign intelligence target.”
The NSA said it also plans to “delete the vast majority of its upstream internet data to further protect the privacy of U.S. person communications.”
Agency officials called the violations “inadvertent compliance lapses.” But the court and IG documents suggest the NSA had not developed a technological way to comply with the rules they had submitted to the court in 2011.
Officials "explained that NSA query compliance is largely maintained through a series of manual checks" and had not "included the proper limiters" to prevent unlawful searches, the NSA internal watchdog reported in a top secret report in January that was just declassified. A new system is being developed now, officials said.
The NSA conducts thousand of searches a year on data involving Americans and the actual numbers of violations were redacted from the documents Circa reviewed.
But a chart in the report showed there three types of violations, the most frequent being 5.2 percent of the time when NSA Section 702 upstream data on U.S. persons was searched.
The inspector general also found  noncompliance between 0.7 percent and 1.4 percent of the time involving NSA activities in which there was a court order to target an American for spying  but the rules were still not followed. Those activities are known as Section 704 and Section 705 spying.
Review | The NSA inspector general's highly redacted chart showing privacy violations.

The IG report spared few words for the NSA’s efforts before the disclosure to ensure it was complying with practices, some that date to rules issued in 2008 in the final days of the Bush administration and others that Obama put into effect in 2011.

“We found that the Agency controls for monitoring query compliance have not been completely developed,” the inspector general reported, citing problems ranging from missing requirements for documentation to the failure to complete controls that would ensure “query compliance.”

The NSA’s Signal Intelligence Directorate, the nation’s main foreign surveillance arm, wrote a letter back to the IG saying it agreed with the findings and that “corrective action plans” are in the works.

Circa reported last week that Obama opened the door for his political aides like Rice to more easily gain access to unmasked Americans’ names in NSA intercepts through a series of rule changes beginning in 2011.
Obama's rule changes opened door for NSA intercepts of Americans to reach political hands
Then as the Inauguration drew closer and closer and they could not dislodge Donald Trump by Recounts and Electoral College Vote count scams.. They realized that they might be exposed.. so Obama signed Executive Order 12333

Yes... in the Final days of the LAME DUCK , the Obama Administration, they expanded the power of the National Security Agency (NSA) to "share" intercepted personal communication with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying any privacy protections. The new rules were issued under section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333 after approval by two Obama Administration officials: Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Director of National Intelligence Director, James Clapper.

Think about it in the context of why they did it. It could not be for National Security reasons. They were leaving in 10 days. Was there something that needed this rule 10 DAYS BEFORE THE END OF AN ADMINISTRATION ?

The Answer.. YES.. They needed to Cover their tracks so it could look like others could have leaked or looked at the information they had secretly been surveiling Donald Trump for over 12 months. They needed to create a fake trail. There is no other logical explanation.
see... the new rules, which were issued in an unclassified document, entitled Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency (NSA), significantly relaxed longstanding limits on what the NSA may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations. These operations are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. Surveillances include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls, and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches. All SET UP 10 DAYS BEFORE LEAVING TO ATTEMPT TO COVER THE TRACKS OF THE OBAMA ADMIN OPERATIVES.

The changes initiated by the Obama Administration in its waning days was a plan to empower a whole lot more agents and officials to search and view raw intelligence data that the OBAMA OPERATIVES HAD SURVEILED OVER THE PAST 6 MONTHS.
The plan was to make sure that intel leaks would possibly grow exponentially and so dilute by expanding the number of people that could be implicated. This allowed the Obama Operatives to hide like a needle in a larger haystack.

Obama Lackeys Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed the new rules permitting the NSA to disseminate raw signals intelligence information on January 3, 2017 after another Obama Lackey and proven Liar Director of National Intelligence James Clapper signed them on December 15, 2016. Ask yourself why the urgency ?
Prior to these changes, the NSA filtered information before sharing intercepted communications with another agency such as the CIA or the intelligence branches of the FBI. The NSA only passed on information deemed pertinent before the new order screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information. 

Now intelligence agencies can search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the NSA and then apply such rules as required for minimizing privacy intrusions. This allowed oversight committees to be able to track the chain of control of any data. With the new Rules the net was spread wide to COVER THE TRACKS OF THE OBAMA OPERATIVES.

Under the new rules, agencies and individuals can ask the NSA for access to specific surveillance feeds premised on the claim that they contain relevant information that is useful to a particular mission. Then the NSA has the discretion to grant such requests if it deems the request reasonable. Properly understood, the contents of the conversations engaged in by members of the Trump Administration and by President Trump himself are now under an increasing risk that they will be exposed to the public for purposes of embarrassing the Trump Administration and in order to impede the effectiveness of his policies.

The Obama Administration’s change in policy has grave implications for former National Security Adviser General Flynn and other Trump Administration officials. Under the new Obama Administration rules, conversations were and are subject to being shared with a wider network of individuals and operatives. This process multiplies the likelihood of leaks and the number of people who could be doing the leaking. Although proof of cause and effect may be difficult, consider the following record, which appears to be far more than coincidental. How Convenient eh ? They thought they had a foolproof way to cover their tracks. Too many eyes saw the raw data so they could blame it on "Rouge Agents of the Deep State"
 
So Back to my Original premise...

This is an operation that went sideways because Hillary did not win. They pinned all their hopes to MAINTAIN the DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA on Hillary winning.

When Donald Trump won... it messed up their whole long game plan. George Soros and his Axis of Domestic Evil... were forced to regroup.

THEY WERE TRYING TO COVER THEIR TRACKS.
This ACT of SPYING ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION has the signature of all Leftist and Islamic State actions. This is the way they play.

They infiltrate a Country using the rules of the State and then slowly bend and manipulate a little piece at a time and the populace does not notice that another little slice of their Republic has been chipped away. Like the proverbial Frog in a pot of slow boiled water.
Getting Hillary elected was to put the Final Nail in the Coffin of the Republic that our Founding Fathers created.

Now it is exposed that Susan Rice was the low level Lackey ... AGAIN!! who was ordered to put her signature to the spying. They higher ups need deniability.

Obama spied on the Pope and got away with it
Obama Spied on Angela Merkel of Germany and got away with it.
Obama Attacked the Conservatives through the IRS .. and Got away with it
Obama and Hillary were running guns through Benghazi and got away with it

Coming to 2016...Susan Rice working for Obama White house now exposed as the Stooge who was asked to Spy on the Trump Campaign.
Why not.. she was a loyal stooge the first time with Benghazi. Hell she was guaranteed that Hillary was going to win. So no one would ever find out. IT WAS IN THE BAG!
But Hillary lost so now Rice was ordered to get more information on Trump so they could incriminate him in some way and boot him from office.
"Stoogey Susan" says OK and does some more spying!
The big mistake was Obama was a lazy President so he wanted all his intelligence briefing in writing so he did not have it on his IPAD..
Bad Move..
Valerie Jarret and John Brennan and maybe even Clapper transcribed all this stuff and put it in the President's Intelligence briefing file daily... It remained in the White House!
It seems like John Brennan is also being fingered as the original source. This, in fact, fits in very well with what we know. Brennan developed the well-leaked paper that said Russia wanted Trump to win. When Comey initially refused to sign on, Brennan seemed to strong arm him back into line. Brennan has been the public face of the Russia allegations. Brennan has been very coy and lawyerly in his denials of being a source of leaks. Rice is a dopey puppet to the bigger fishes! She does what she is told.
Former Obama administration officials have boasted about how they spread information they had gathered on Trump and his associates across the intelligence community for the self-professed high minded purpose of preserving it from destruction by the Trump administration.
Key point #1.
Nunes has known about the unmasking controversy since January, when two sources in the intelligence community approached him. The sources told Nunes who was responsible and at least one of the Trump team names that was unmasked. They also gave him serial numbers of reports that documented the activity.
This was long before Trump sent out his now-infamous March 4 tweets claiming then-President Barack Obama “wiretapped” Trump Tower during the 2016 election.
Nunes had asked intelligence agencies to see the reports in question, but was stonewalled.
Key point #2.
He eventually was able to view them, but there was only one safe place to see the documents without compromising the sources’ identities — the old executive office building on White House grounds, which has a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) required to view classified or top secret reports. The White House did not tell Nunes about the existence of the intelligence reports, but did help him gain access to the documents at his request, the source said.
SO HERE WE HAVE THE UNRAVELING OF THE SPYING CAPER THAT THE CABAL THOUGHT THEY WOULD GET AWAY WITH... ....
SOON IF WE HAVE EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW... WE SHOULD BE SEEING A LOT OF HIGH POWERED LEFTIES AND FORMER ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS IN JAIL.
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA MEDDLING.. THIS HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE OBAMA/CLINTON/SOROS AXIS OF DOMESTIC EVIL.. MEDDLING
👮👮 Arrest the bastards!!

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

BREAK UP FACEBOOK.. THEY ARE TOO BIG AND ARE NOW A MONOPOLY!

FACTS TO CONSIDER . FACEBOOK IS A MONOPOLY THAT MUST BE STOPPED SINCE IT HAS A LEFT WING BIAS! LOOK AT THE WORLD MAP BELOW!
Please Read and Share!

We must ask Trump Admin Justice Department to file an Anti Monopoly Lawsuit against Facebook. Conservatives are being targeted. Just like the IRS and others. Facebook is a tool of the left that pretends to be a business working in the FREE MARKET! IT IS NOT.


The Sherman Act also makes it a crime to monopolize any part of interstate commerce. An unlawful monopoly exists when one firm controls the market for a product or service, and it has obtained that market power, not because its product or service is superior to others, but by suppressing competition with anti competitive conduct. Facebook has bought up all forms of Social media and dominates the space.
Anti Trust Laws and Monopoly was were written before the age of Social media and so they need to be amended. 
 
In the age of Information coming via Social Media... we cannot let one LEFT LEANING PUNK LIKE ZUCKERBERG AND HIS GANG TO CONTROL THE FLOW OF INFORMATION TO A LARGE SEGMENT OF THE AMERICAN POPULATION.
Having read about the Facebook Team Conspiring like MTV did in the 1990's with the Left and Bill Clinton along with a heavily biased left leaning media, it is time for us to stop this infringement. So Law Professors have likened Facebook to the New York Times and its right to block and control and endorse whom ever they want. THAT IS WRONG.. because in Newspapers, Radio and TV there is competition. NOT IN THE WORLD OF FACEBOOK. LOOK AT THE MAP AGAIN!. 
 
 

I CALL ON THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO DO SO .

If they can dominate the space and censor the speech they do not like and influence Politics they are a Danger to AMERICA and must be stopped.

FYI.. Here are the Anti Trust Laws on the Books: Many consumers have never heard of antitrust laws, but enforcement of these laws saves consumers millions and even billions of dollars a year. The Federal Government enforces three major Federal antitrust laws, and most states also have their own. Essentially, these laws prohibit business practices that unreasonably deprive consumers of the benefits of competition, resulting in higher prices for products and services.

The three major Federal antitrust laws are:
The Sherman Antitrust Act The Clayton Act The Federal Trade Commission Act.
The following information on these laws comes from the Antitrust Enforcement and the Consumer guide. The Sherman Antitrust Act
This Act outlaws all contracts, combinations, and conspiracies that unreasonably restrain interstate and foreign trade. This includes agreements among competitors to fix prices, rig bids, and allocate customers, which are punishable as criminal felonies.
The Sherman Act also makes it a crime to monopolize any part of interstate commerce. An unlawful monopoly exists when one firm controls the market for a product or service, and it has obtained that market power, not because its product or service is superior to others, but by suppressing competition with anticompetitive conduct.
The Act, however, is not violated simply when one firm's vigorous competition and lower prices take sales from its less efficient competitors; in that case, competition is working properly. The Clayton Act
This Act is a civil statute (carrying no criminal penalties) that prohibits mergers or acquisitions that are likely to lessen competition. Under this Act, the Government challenges those mergers that are likely to increase prices to consumers. All persons considering a merger or acquisition above a certain size must notify both the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission. The Act also prohibits other business practices that may harm competition under certain circumstances. The Federal Trade Commission Act
This Act prohibits unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce, but carries no criminal penalties. It also created the Federal Trade Commission to police violations of the Act.
The Department of Justice also often uses other laws to fight illegal activities, including laws that prohibit false statements to Federal agencies, perjury, obstruction of justice, conspiracies to defraud the United States and mail and wire fraud. Each of these crimes carries its own fine and imprisonment term, which may be added to the fines and imprisonment terms for antitrust law violations.
BREAK UP FACEBOOK.. THEY ARE TOO BIG AND ARE NOW A MONOPOLY!
The fact that facebook has a liberal bias was proved after the leaking of a memo from Mark Zuckerberg, its chief executive, in which he called for employees to stop crossing out Black Lives Matter slogans on the walls of the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. https://www.theverge.com/2016/5/12/11665298/facebook-trending-news-topics-human-editors-bias
 
Here is some info hat conservative articles were suppressed, which were first reported by the website Gizmodo. More Proof http://thefederalist.com/2016/05/09/former-facebook-workers-confess-we-routinely-suppressed-conservative-news/