Thursday, July 16, 2015

FACEBOOK BANS ME FOR 30 DAYS FOR POSTING THIS



You know ISIS Desecrates Graves of their enemies..

Now the African Blacks in the USA want to desecrate the graves of Confederate Leaders. They want to desecrate the Grave of Confederate General Nathan Bedford in Memphis TN. If it is OK then they will move to the next one and the next one.

There is a common link. A regressive DNA that runs in all primitive people.

You can dress them up but you cannot modify their primal nature!

And don't tell me "most blacks don't feel that way".. that's the same shit we say about Muslims right?

and I do not want to co-exist with primitive minded people.

That is why I call for Revolution followed by secession.


FREE FUCKING SPEECH IS DEAD.. IN AMERICA...

  TIME FOR REVOLUTION IN THE STREETS...

RRR

Monday, July 13, 2015

Origin of The Fleur-de-lis. Some stupid people say this is a slave related Symbol. HOGWASH!

The Fleur-de-lis

Stained glass window in the shape of a fleur-de-lys, Bourges cathedral, 15th c. Note the various themes: the Trinity, which the 3 petals were understood to recall, is represented; angels are bearing the shield as they are supporters of the arms of France, the dove descending from heaven recalls the legend of the baptism of Clovis when a dove brought the sacred ointment to Saint Remigius.
The origin of the fleur de lis has been debated for centuries. There are a number of inter-related questions with respect to the fleur-de-lis:

  • what is the origin of the design which we know by that name?
  • how old is it, and when was it first adopted by the kings of France?
  • why did they adopt it?
  • what is a fleur-de-lys: that is, to what flower or real object does it correspond?
  • where does the name itself come from?
This article provides answers and clues. My personal opinion is as follows:

  • the design can be found in many places long before heraldic times, as far back as Mesopotamia. It is essentially a stylized flower, and served as a decorative element and became associated over time with royalty, especially in the High Middle Ages.
  • As a heraldic charge, it dates from the 12th c. It is first adopted as a semis on a field by the French king Philippe II (1180-1214) with certainty, perhaps already by his father Louis VII (1137-80). At a minimum, the arms "azure, a semis of fleur-de-lis or" are associated with French kings from 1200.
  • the fleur-de-lys, as emblem (as opposed to heraldic charge) appears on coins and seals from the 10th c. at least. Typically, it forms the end of a scepter, or decorates the rim of a crown, or is held, over-sized, by the king along with a scepter. So there is, by the 11th-12th c., a strong association with royal sovereignty. In fact, coins of the Emperor Frederic I show him holding such a scepter. Moreover, supposing that it was already called a fleur-de-lys at the time, the lily flower had strong religious connotations, especially with the Virgin Mary, and later (in the 14th c.) with the Trinity.
    seal of Philip II, 1180
    Seal of Philip II Augustus, king of France, 1180.
    Legend: Philippus Dei gratia Francorum rex".
    From the French Ministry of Culture's Banques d'images CARIM.
  • what it is, or initially was, is hotly debated. I dismiss all non-floral origins as fanciful. It is a stylized flower, but which flower? It looks more like an iris than a lily. Moreover, lillies are never yellow in the wild, whereas some irises are. Could there have been confusion between the two flowers? The word "lis" appears in French in 1150, whereas the word "iris" designates the flower in the 13th c. The term "fleur de lis" in the heraldic sense is attested in 1225. A confusion seems implausible.
  • However, a hypothesis ventured in the 17th c. sounds very plausible to me. One species of wild iris, the Iris pseudacorus, yellow flag in English, is yellow and grows in marshes (cf. the azure field, for water). Its name in German is Lieschblume (also gelbe Schwertlilie), but Liesch was also spelled Lies and Leys in the Middle Ages. It is easy to imagine that, in Northern France, the Lieschblume would have been called "fleur-de-lis." This would explain the name and the formal origin of the design, as a stylized yellow flag. There is a fanciful legend about Clovis which links the yellow flag explicitly with the French coat of arms.
A bonus of this theory is that the yellow flag is also called "flambe" or "flamme" in old French, which links it very nicely to the oriflamme.

The French Arms

As will be shown later, they were Azure, a semis of fleur-de-lis or since 1200 or perhaps even 1170-80. They were changed to Azure, 3 fleur-de-lis or in 1376, by order of Charles V the Wise. It is sometimes said that the reason was to spite the English King, who bore quarterly France Ancient and England, and differentiate the arms of France from that claimed by England. I am pretty sure the arms of France were shown with 3 fleur-de-lys prior to that, and possibly prior to the Hundred Years War, for esthetic reasons. But it's an interesting idea.

Pastoureau on the fleur-de-lis

Here is a loose translation from translation Michel Pastoureau: Traité d'Héraldique, Paris, 1979.
"The use for ornamental or symbolic purposes of the stylised flower usually called fleur de lis is common to all eras and all civilisations. It is an essentially graphic theme found on Mesopotamian cylinders, Egyptian bas-reliefs, Mycenean potteries, Sassanid textiles, Gaulish coins, Mameluk coins, Indonesian clothes, Japanese emblems and Dogon totems. The many writers who have discussed the topic agree that it has little to do graphically with the lily, but disagree on whether it derives from the iris, the broom, the lotus or the furze, or whether it represents a trident, an arrowhead, a double axe, or even a dove or a pigeon. It is in our opinion a problem of little importance. The essential point is that it is a very stylised figure, probably a flower, that has been used as an ornament or an emblem by almost all civilisations of the old and new worlds.
The oldest known examples of fleur-de-lis similar to those used in the Medieval Western world and in modern times can be found on assyrian bas-reliefs from the 3d millenium BC. It is found on tiaras, necklaces, scepters, and seems already to play the role of royal attribute. Those found a little later in Crete, India and Egypt probably have a similar meaning. In numismatics, we find the fleur-de-lis on a few Greek coins and on several Roman coins from the Republic (mark of monetary magistrates) or the Empire (attribute of Hope) and especially on Gaulish coins. [The book shows three coins: a Gaulish coin (1st c. AD), a Mameluk coin (1390) and a coin of Louis VI of France (1110-30), all displaying an unmistakable fleur-de-lis (at least the upper-half of one, and a sort of triangle in the lower-half).] Whereas, in Greek and Roman coins, it is a fleuron of variable shape, in the Celtic case it is a true heraldic fleur-de-lis as it reappears in the 13th c.
While retaining its value as royal attribute, the fleur-de-lis acquires in the high Middle Ages a strong Christic meaning, stemming from (among others) the famous verse of the Song of Solomon (2:1): "ego flos campi et lilium convallium" many times repeated and commented from Saint Jerome to Saint Bernard. Therefore it is not rare, until the end of the 12th c., to see Christ represented amidst more or less stylised lilies or fleurons, whose design could also recall the Trinity of the Chrismon (Christ's monogram). Then, slowly, on this Christic content is added a Marial symbolic, linked to the development of the Cult of Mary, and to which the next verse of the Song of Solomon is related (2:2): "sicut lilium inter spinas, sic amica mea inter filias" as well as many parts of the Scriptures and the Fathers of the Church, where the lily is presented as symbol of purity, virginity and chastity. In iconography, the lily becomes a favorite attribute of the Virgin Mary and will remain so until the 16th c.
The origin of fleur-de-lis adopted as heraldic emblems by the Kings of France is a problem that has elicited much discussion. From the middle of the 14th c, several works (mostly designed to legitimize the Valois claims on the throne, against Edward III of England), explain that the king of France "bears arms of three fleur-de-lis as sign of the blessed Trinity, sent by God through His angel to Clovis, first Christian king... telling him to erase the three crescents he bore on his arms and replace them with the fleur-de-lis." This legend reappears at the end of the 15th c, but this time the alleged arms born by Clovis before his baptism are not azure, three crescents or but azure, three toads or. Significantly, at the end of the Middle Ages, Clovis' paganism is not represented by a Muslim symbol (crescent) but a demonic one (toad). In any case, it is only in the 17th c that this legendary origin of the fleur-de-lys began to be subject to the criticism of scholars. The famous Scevole de Sainte-Marthe seems to be the first to assert that the fleur-de-lys appeared on the shield only under Philippe Auguste (1180-1223) or Louis VIII (1223-26). However, until the end of the 19th c writers continued to profer the most fanciful opinions on the subject. Today, Sainte-Marthe's opinion cannot be denied anymore: it is known that there are no coats of arms before 1130-1140, and the king of France was no the first to adopt a coat. H. Pinoteau's work of the past 30 years have shed definitive light on the subject: although we have no iconographic testimony of the coat azure, semy of fleur-de-lys or by a king of France before Louis VIII (on a stained glass window in Chartres of 1230; Louis VIII did bear the coat before becoming king, on a seal of 1211), several chroniclers contemporary of Philippe Auguste report that he used a banner with these arms, and his seal shows that as early as 1180 he used a fleur-de-lys as emblem. [example of an official of the royal demesne bearing the coat on his 1207 seal, and a cousin of the king augmenting Courtenay with a shield of France Ancient on a 1210 seal. It may even have been adopted by Louis VII (1154-80).]
[The seals of Philip Augustus clearly have a single fleur-de-lys on the reverse as of 1180. Before that, from 1050 at least, the seals of French kings show them sitting, holding a sceptre in their left hand and what looks like a fleur-de-lis in their right hand. The head of the sceptre is a lozenge, but often the fleurons on the crown (3 of them) look like fleur-de-lys.]
It remains to know why the king of France adopted the fleur-de-lys as an emblem when all other sovereigns of Europe chose animals. The reason seems twofold: on the one hand this flower had always retained its role as attribute of sovereignty: it is in this capacity that it appears on several royal Carolingian and Ottonian attributes, on the scepter of Capetian kings since Robert (996-1031), on the reverse of Louis VI coins (early 12th c) and even on coins of Lothaire (954-986). On the other hand, the flower acquired a strong religious meaning, either Christic or Marial; it is probably under the influence of saint Bernard and Suger that Louis VII (who was with Saint Louis the most pious king of France) adopeted this emblem which symbolized both the royal dignity and Christian piety of his person and his lineage.
[discussion of other families with the fleur-de-lys on their coat.]
The design of the fleur-de-lys has always been relatively stable and since the 13th c the heraldic vocabulary used adjectives or phrases to specify the design when it varied from the usual one. The most ancient variation is the fleur-de-lys 'au pied nourri', i.e. without the lower part, everything under the horizontal bar apparently cut off. Old French also calls this fleur-de-lys 'en lonc' or 'a pié coupé'. Sometimes the lower part is represented but in a triangular shape: it is then called 'au pied posé'. These two variants appear in the North of France and the Netherlands. Towards the middle of the 13th c, some seals represent the fleur-de-lys in a more naturalistic fashion: it has stamina between the petals, and the petals end with arabesques, as if one was trying to evoke the last stage of bloom. Such a flower is called épanouie or florencée, that of Florence being the most famous example [Lille also bears the fleur-de-lys épanouie]."

Woodward on the fleur-de-lis

"Of all the floral devices used in Heraldry the most famous is the fleur-de-lis now generally identified with the iris. Its floral character has been altogether denied by some writers who have professed to trace its origin to the head of a lance, spear or sceptre, to an architectural finial; to a frog, bee, a sacred monogram, etc. (The student who is interested will find all suggestions stated, and refuited, in the excellent work of M. Rey: Histoire du Drapeau, Paris, 1837, and can hardly failed to be surprised at the prodigious number of treatises which have been published on the subject).
It is at first sight so difficult to explain the reason why, when other great potentates were assuming for their armorial emblems the lion, the eagle, etc, the sovereigns of France should have preferred the apparently humble iris-flower, that we are hardly surprised to find the fact accounted for by the tradition that it was brought from heaven itself by an angel to Clovis, King of France, on the occasion of his baptism, as a special mark of favor on the part of the Blessed Virgin, whose peculiar symbol the lily has always been, The tradition has many variations of place and circumstance. It is, however, somewhat surprising to find that the French bishops at the Council of Trent, when disputing for the precedence of their sovereign, fortified their claim by alleging that the King of France had received the fleur-de-lis direct from heaven: Gallorum regem unctum esse et lilia divinitus accepisse!
The most probable explanation of the origin of the fleur-de-lis as a device of the Kings of France is that put forth by M. Rey, which has received the approval of Mr Planche, "that the fleur de lys, or flower de luce was merely a rebus signifying fleur de Louis." Up to the time of Louis VII the kings of that name (identical with Clovis) called themselves, and signed themselves, Loi"s or Loys. Even after the name had settled into its present form, Loys was still the signature of the kings of France up to the time of Louis XIII (1610-43). Loys, or Louis VII received from his father the surname Florus.
The coins of Louis VI and Louis VII are the earliest on which the fleur-de-lys appears. But it also appears at that time on the coins of Florence (a city which wad the mint of many European sovereigns, and whence the name florin is derived). M. Rey, in view of these facts, inquires: "Can we not say then, that the coincidence of the surname Florus with the name of Loys or lis, of that of Florence with that of fleur de lis, of all these names and surnames, gave rise to the formation of the name of our illustrious emblem?"
M. Rey traces the fleur-de-lys as an artistic ornament to very early times; centuries antecedent to its adoption as an armorial design. (It is curious that on a coin of Hadrian, Gaul is personified by a woman bearing in her hand a lily: the legend is restitutori Galliae.) On a medal of Galba the fleur-de-lis forms the head of a sceptre. Montfaucon gives an example from an ancient diptych in which the crown of the empress Placidia (daughter of the emperor Theodosius the Great), who died in 450, is enseigned with a fleur-de-lys. These, and a multitude of other early instances, are given in the plates by M. Rey, to whose work I refer again the curious reader. In France, as in many other countries, the sceptre borne by the prince was, at a very early date, ornamented by a flora lemblem, varying in detail but bearing a general resemblance to the fleur-de-lys of later times.
The seals of the emperors Henry I (d. 1024) and Conrad II (d. 1039) afford early illustrations of the custom (see Glafey, specimen decadem sigillorum, Leipzig 1749; Roemer-Büchner, Die Siegel der deutschen Kaiser, Frankfurt am Main, 1851). In France the germ of the armorial fleur-de-lys can be traced to the fleurons which adorn the sceptres and crowns of Henri I, Philippe I and Louis VI (11-12th c.). A signet of Louis VII bears a fleur-de-lys florencee, but the charge first takes a definite heraldic shape on the seals of Philippe Augustus (d. 1223); whose great seal represents him crowned with an open crown of fleurons and holding in his right hand a fleur-de-lys (several of his successors are similaryl represented), in his left a sceptre surmounted by a lozenge charged with the like emblem. On his counterseal is engraved in an oval a fleur-de-lis entirely of the heraldic shape. (M. Demay, in his book vited in previous pages, points out, pp. 194-196, the analogy which exists between the fleurons, held in the hand, or surmounting the sceptre as well as adorning the crown, to the effigies of the blessed Virgin depicted on the seal of the Chapter of Notre Dame at Paris in 1146, and on that of the abbey of Faremoutiers in 1197, with those born by St.Louis in 1226). On the occasion of the coronation of his son Philip (in his own lifetime) the king, Louis VII, regulated the details of the ceremony, and among other things prescribed that the prince should wear "ses chausses...en soye couleur bleu azure semée en moult endroit de fleurs de lys d'or, puis aussi sa dalmatique de meme couleur et oeuvre" (Gourdon de Genouilhac, l'Art Héraldique, p.224)."

The Clovis Legend

I will mention an amusing legend, according to which Clovis, on his way to fight the king of Aquitania Alaric, and defeat him at Vouille near Poitiers (in 507), was searching in vain for a ford to cross a river, when a doe, frightened by the soldiers, jumped across the river along a ford that it only knew. The whole army then followed. On the banks, wild yellow irises grew in abundance: Clovis came off his horse, picked one and put it on his helmet as a symbol of his future victory. Thereafter did the kings of France use the fleur de lis as their emblem. The story is of course fanciful, but a nice one (somewhat reminiscent of the manner in which Attila found his way to Europe, actually).

Of Flowers

from Henry Correvon: Fleur des eaux et des marais; Neuchâtel (Suisse), 1961: Editions Delachaux & Niestle.
"Let us discuss now the iris, of which there are very interesting aquatic species. The marsh plant par excellence, at least in our regions, is the Water iris (iris des eaux), Iris Pseudoacorus, whose bright yellow large flowers bloom from June to September all across Europe, Western Asia and North Africa.... [He goes on to tell the story of Clovis fording the river which I narrated previously and concludes:] the flag of the Kings of France then represented three of these iris flowers. In England this flower is known as 'flagflower'. "


Separated at birth: a fleur-de-lys and an iris, both spotted in Florence, Italy.

Lis and Iris in French

The first use of the word "iris" in French is in a 13th c. manuscript, Le Livre des Medecines Simples, where it says: "iris porte roge flor et ireos blanches." The word existed before, to name a prism, or rock through which the light diffracts into a rainbow (here the etymology is clear: Iris, messenger of the Gods). How it came to designate the plant I don't know (ref: Godefroy: Dictionnaire de l'Ancienne Langue Francaise, vol. 10, Kraus reprints, 1969).
The first instance of the word "lis", plural of an unattested "lil" from Latin lilium, is around 1150 for the flower. The word is often found as metonymy for the lily flower, and used in numerous metaphors for whiteness, purity, etc. For example, in Erec et Enéide by Chrestien de Troyes (ca. 1170): "plus ot que n'est la flor de lis, Cler et blanc le front et le vis" (forehead and face pale and white more than the lily flower) (example taken from: Tobler-Lommatzsch: Altfranzösisches Wörterbuch). The word fleur de lis is also used as metaphor for the Virgin Mary (1223). First clear-cut use of the word "fleur de lis" in its heraldic acception is in 1225 in Durmart le Gallois, although Victor Gay (Glossaire Archéologique du Moyen-Âge, vol. 1, Paris, 1887) claims that the word is used in an ordnance of Louis VII (1137-1180), without giving any reference.
What is really strange is that the lily was such a constant metaphor for whiteness, and would become a golden charge. As mentioned before, lilies are usually white, not yellow.

Lillies and Irises in English

What about the English language? What follows are edited OED entries. It appears that:

  • in English, the iris was often called fleur-de-lis or flower-de-luce, since the 16th century.
  • Fleur-de-lis, to designate the heraldic charge, appears as early as 1400.
  • the yellow iris, or common British species (Iris pseudacorus) is also called Yellow Flag.
What to make of it? The late date for the use of fleur-de-lis in English to designate the flower makes me suspect that, here, the charge came first and the name was applied to the flower because of the formal resemblance.

     iris , sb. Pl. irides , irises. [a. Gr. iris, stem
irid-.  The senses (except 3 and 6) correspond to those of the Gr. word;
so also Fr. iris.  The pl. irides is chiefly used in sense 4.]
 1. Gr. Myth.  The goddess who acted as the messenger of the gods, and was held
to display as her sign, or appear as, the rainbow; hence, allusively, a messenger.
 2. a. A rainbow; a many-coloured refraction of light from drops of water.
 b. transf.  A rainbow-like or iridescent appearance; a circle or halo of
prismatic colours; a combination or alternation of brilliant colours.
 c. fig.
 3. a. A hexagonal prismatic crystal (mentioned by Pliny Nat. Hist.)
 4. a. Anat. b. (transf.) Entom.  c. Photogr. = iris-diaphragm; 
 5. Bot.  A genus of plants, the type of the natural order Iridaceae, natives of
Europe, N. Africa, and the temperate regions of Asia and America; most of the
species have tuberous (less commonly bulbous or fibrous) roots, sword-shaped
equitant leaves, and showy flowers; formerly often called Fleur-de-lis or
Flower-de-luce.  Also, a plant of this genus.blue iris, Iris germanica, the
German Flag, a common cultivated species; fetid iris, the Gladden, Iris
foetidissima; Florentine iris = white iris; stinking iris = fetid iris;
white iris, Iris florentina, from which orrisroot is obtained; yellow iris, the
Yellow Flag, Iris Pseudacorus, the common British species.
 1562 Turner Herbal. ii. 23 a, Iris is knowen both of the Grecianes and Latines
by that name; it is called..in Englishe flour de lyce. 1578 Lyte Dodoens ii.
xxxv. 192 There be many kindes of Iris, or floure Deluce. 1578 Lyte Dodoens 193
The Irides or flower Deluces do most commonly flower about May. 

     fleur-de-lis , flower-de-luce . Forms: &ia.. 4-6 flour(e-de-lys(e, -lice,
-lyce, (pl. -lycis), 7 -lis, 5-7 -luce, pl. -luces, 6 floredelise, Sc. 5
flour(e-the-lis, -lys.  &ib.. 6-9 flower-, (6 flowre-)de-luce, (pl. -luces),
6-7 -lice, (pl. -lices), 6 -lyce, 8 -lys, 7-9 -lis.  &ig.. 8-9 fleur-de-lys, 9
-lis, pl. 7 fleur-de-lysses, -lyzes, 9 fleurs-de-lis, -lys, -luce. [The
prevailing form is a. mod.Fr. fleur de lis , formerly lys; but this form is
scarcely found in Eng. before the 19th c.; see above.  The form flower-de-luce
survives as a poetical archaism and in U.S.  The Fr. is literally `lily-flower'
from lis, formerly lys, in OFr. liz for lils lily, the s of the nom. sing.
being retained in the oblique cases; the English spelling de-lice, de-lyce, was
in its origin merely graphic (cf. price, mice, syce, etc.), but in the 16th c.
was associated with a fanciful etymology flos deliciae, and the form deluce, de
luce apparently also leaned upon a fanciful derivation.  Occasional English
forms were deluce, delyce flowre.]
 1. The flower of a plant of the genus Iris (esp. I. pseudacorus); the plant
itself.  Cf. flag sb.1 1.
 13.. E.E. Allit. P. A. 752 &Th.y colour passez &th.e flour-de-lys. A. 1400
Hymn Virg. vi. in Warton Hist. Eng. Poetry x. (1840) II. 110 Heil fairer then
the flour de lys. C. 1475 Rauf Coil&ygh.ear 670 Flowris with Flourdelycis
formest in feir. 1500-20 Dunbar Thistle & Rose 138 Lat no netill vyle..Hir
fallow to the gudly flour delyce. 1590 Spenser F.Q. ii. vi. 16 The lilly, lady
of the flowring field, The flowre-deluce, her lovely paramoure. 1699 Bentley
Phal. Pref. 104 The Muses are invited to come under the shadow of
Flower-de-luces. 1731-37 Miller Gard. Dict. (ed. 3) s.v. Iris, Iris
purpurea..Common purple Fleur-de-Lys. 1837 Campbell Lines in La Perouse's Voy.
Poet. Wks. 298 When, rapt in fancy..I..plucked the fleur-de-lys by Jesso's
streams. 1866 Longf. Flower-de-luce viii, O flower-de-luce, bloom on, and let
the river linger to kiss thy feet!
 b. fig.
 1500-20 Dunbar Ballat Our Lady 42 Haile, fair fresche flour-de-lyce!
 2. The heraldic lily; a device supposed by some to have originally represented
an iris, by others the top of a sceptre, of a battle-axe or other weapon.  It
is best known from having been borne upon the royal arms of France under the
old monarchy.
 C. 1400 Melayne 94 Wende thy waye..To Charles that beris the flour delyce.
1488 in Ld. Treas. Acc. Scotl. I. 81 Item ane vche of gold like a flourethelis
of diamantis. 1529 Rastell Pastyme (1811) 75, .iii. floure delyse in a feld
asure was sent to Kyng Clouys from hevyn for his armys. 1622 Malynes Anc.
Law-Merch. 189 The French Kings Tent with the three Flowerdeluces. 1709 Addison
Tatler No. 161 &page.9 A bloody Flag, embroidered with Flower-de Luces. 1843
Lytton Last Bar. ii. ii, A lofty head-gear, embroidered with fleur-de-lis. 1851
Layard Pop. Acc. Discov. Nineveh vii. 163 The first god wears the square horned
cap, surmounted by a point, or fleur-de-lys.
 b. The royal arms of France; hence also the French royal family, the French
flag (before 1789), the French nation or government.

     flag , sb.1 Also 4-7 flagg(e, (5 flegge). [Of obscure origin; cf. Dutch
flag, occurring in Bible 1637, Job viii. 11 margin (the Eng. Bible has the same
word in this passage), also mod.Da. flaeg (in Dansk Ordb. 1802, but not found in
MDa., which has flae, flaede in the same sense).]
 1. a. One of various endogenous plants, with a bladed or ensiform leaf, mostly
growing in moist places.  Now regarded as properly denoting a member of the
genus Iris (esp. I. pseudacorus) but sometimes (as in early use) applied to any
reed or rush. [cited 1387 Trevisa Higden (Rolls) IV. 157] 
 b. With words indicating the species, as garden flag (Iris germanica); sweet
smelling flag, spicewort (Acorus Calamus); water flag, yellow flag (Iris
pseudacorus).  Also corn-flag.  1580 Baret Alv. F 639 The water Flagge, or 
the yellowe wild Iris. 

The Yellow Flag Hypothesis

In his dictionary (s.v. fleur-de-lis) Furetière mentions a hypothesis put forth by Godefridus Henschenius, a Flemish Jesuit priest (1601-81): he claims that the fleur-de-lis represents the yellow flag (Iris Pseudacorus) and mentions that the name of that flower in German is "Lieskblume": that's how Furetière writes it.
It took me a while to figure out that he meant Lieschblume. As it turns out, according to the Brockhaus Encyclopedia, the word Liesch (also found as Leesch and Lees) designates a number of plants of the reed family, and also reed-shaped plants, like (among others) the gelbe Schwertlilie. Now Lilie is lily, Schwertlilie is iris, and gelbe Schwertlilie (yellow iris literally) is the Iris Pseudacorus, the native wild iris of Europe. In Grimm's Deutsches Wörterbuch (Leipzig, 1885, vol. 7), liesch is said to have appeared in many forms in the Middle Ages and in dialects: lisch, lüsch, lies, liesz, liesze, lieyes, leys (the last two in "niederrheinisch", Lower-Rhine dialect I presume). Also, Grimm translate Lieschblume as "flos iridis, flos gladioli".
So Lieschblume is iris flower, and the Liesch is one of the names of the yellow flag, I. pseudacorus. Moerover, Liesch was variously written as Lees, Lies, Liesz, Leys, Lieyes. That's enough to let me believe that, in pre-heraldic times (say 10th-11th c.) a confusion could have arisen in the North of France between Lieschblume, translated as fleur-de-lis and the iris flower.
Other interesting details:

  • according to Brockhaus, the lilium of Old Testament is none other than the Iris pseudacorus.
  • the Iris pseudacorus, as the lily, was an emblem of Mary, and Brockhaus cites Dürer and Hugo van der Goes.
  • another name for the yellow flag in French is "flambe" or (in some dialects) "flamme". The word comes from flamma or flammula. There is a 14th c. citation in Godefroy: "Yreos est flambe qui a la fleur blanche" (H. de Mandeville). Littré says: "Flambe: nom donné à l'iris Germanica et à l'iris des marais (iris pseudacorus), dite aussi flamme dans quelques provinces." (name given to i. Germanica [which is blue] and to the yellow flag, also called Flamme in some provinces.)
This makes it quite interesting, because the French "flag" or banner of the Middle Ages, the oriflamme, aurea flammula, can become... the golden fleur-de-lis.

Saturday, June 20, 2015

OBAMAVILLE..

 

 THIS IS A SNAPSHOT OF A PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL NEW DEAL.. CITY... I WANT OUT!! BALTIMORE...

SECEDE PATRIOTS .,.. THEY WILL SUCK US DRY!! YOU CANNOT CO-EXIST.


Read and Share a snap shot of the cities they are building around you. The Illegal Alein population will help swell this blight even faster.

FYI.. Citizens of this metropolis have not elected a Republican as mayor since 1963, before the War on Poverty began. That mayor’s 4 year term is the only interruption in Democrat rule since 1947. They have had Democrat control for 64 of the last 68 years, and sole control for the last 48 years straight.


Their mayor is black. Their previous mayor, Sheila Dixon, was black. She was convicted of embezzlement in 2010 and couldn’t finish her term. They had a white mayor (current Democratic Presidential hopeful Martin O’Malley) for eight years. The mayor before him was black.


Their City Council consists of 15 members. All fifteen are Democrats. The Council President is black. Democrats have had control of legislation in Baltimore for the last 50 years. Every program, policy, initiative, or school curriculum that exists in Baltimore was enacted by liberal Democrats.


The Police Commissioner is black. Approximately 50% of the police force is black.


The School Superintendent is black, along with the School Board. The district has an annual budget of $1.32 billion to teach 84,000 kids. The Baltimore school system ranks second among the nation’s 100 largest school districts in how much it spent per pupil at $15,700 per student. Only NYC spends more. Only two thirds of students graduate high school, despite this high level of spending.


The average SAT scores of Baltimore City public school students are: 379 in Reading; 376 in Math; 381 in Writing. These are the scores of the best of the best in Baltimore schools who actually think they should get into college. The average scores in the country, which still suck, are around 500. Students with these scores have about a 15% chance of graduating college. This is the ROI you get after spending $188,000 per student over their 12 year academic career.
The population of Baltimore is 623,000 and 63% are black. Median household income is $41,000, with 24% living below the poverty line. The home ownership rate is 48%. The percentage of college graduates is 27%.
The population was 950,000 in 1950, so it has fallen by 35% in the last 65 years. The population was 24% black in 1950. Decades of liberal Democrat policies drove most of the white population out of the city.


Baltimore’s violent crime rate is 370% higher than the U.S. rate. They have over 200 murders, 300 rapes, 3,600 robberies, 4,600 assaults, 7,800 burglaries, and 22,000 thefts per year. These are all 2 to 4 times the U.S. averages per 100,000 people.


Over 35% of all Baltimore residents get food stamps.
Over 85% of the kids get free breakfasts and lunches at school. More than 60% of Baltimore residents are receiving some form of government assistance.
Baltimore’s welfare paradise is paid for by outrageously high taxes. It’s income tax rate of 3.2% is on top of the state rate of 4.75%. It’s property tax rate is more than double the other counties in Maryland. The sales tax rate is 6%. Corporations pay an income tax rate of 8.25%.
The percentage of out of wedlock births to black women in Baltimore exceeds 72%. Baltimore and Detroit are the two cities with populations over 600,000 with the highest percentage of single parent households – 59% to 61%.
The reported unemployment rate for Baltimore is 8.2%, one of the highest in the country. In reality, 42% of the working age population is not working. Young black men between the ages of 20 and 24 have a reported unemployment rate of 37%. But in reality, it is north of 60%. The number of employees in 1990 totaled 475,000. Today they total 365,000, down 23%

LEAVE.. THIS BLIGHT TO THEM.. YOU DO NOT WANT THESE CITIES !!

RRR

MAKE NO MISTAKE POPE FRANCIS IS A LEFTY!
SET UP BY THE SOCIALISTS TO TRY AND TURN THE MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS STREAMING ACROSS OUR BORDER AGAINST THE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES THEY CAME TO AMERICA FOR IN THE FIRST PLACE!



Thursday, April 30, 2015

WILL YOU SUPPORT A TEMPORARY MILITARY TAKE OVER TO RESTORE AMERICA?

IF THE LEADERS OF THE COUP ARE PATRIOTS AND FORMER MILITARY GENERALS... WHO LOVE AMERICA AND HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF INTEGRITY WOULD YOU SUPPORT A COUP/REVOLUTION WHICH HAVE RULE BY A COMMITTEE OF CIVILIAN CONSERVATIVES WHO WILL RUN GOVERNMENT AND THE GENERALS/ LOYAL MILITARY WHO WILL DEFEND OUR NATION AGAINST ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC

REMEMBER THE COUP STARTS WITH A REVOLT LED BY "WE THE PEOPLE".
And yes we must remove Obama and his Cabal and Restore the Constitution.

COUP/REVOLUTION
SAME MEANING IN THIS POST


PLEASE READ THE WHOLE TEXT.. THEN SHARE AND ASK YOUR FRIENDS!!

IF YOU HAVE ALREADY ... SHARE IT AGAIN !! GET THE WORD OUT!

THE REVOLUTIONARY COMMAND WOULD NOT INCLUDE ANYONE ONE OF THE CURRENT MEMBERS OF CENTCOM. THEY ARE ALL OBAMA LACKEYS.

READ AND TELL US WHAT YOU THINK ??

So many of you are so afraid of a Military Removal of the Obama Cabal.... You have referred to the founding fathers and Military Control. The fact is that you got the logic backwards. The Founding Fathers did not want a Military Commander in Chief and wanted the military in the command of a Civilian. That is why the President.. a Civilian is the CIC. But delve deeper into the intents of the balance of power and you will see that writings are explicit about Revolution.

Thomas Jefferson said it best…
"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. ...

And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as
to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost
in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
It is its natural manure."


He did not mean a namby pamby vote … neither did he say that REAL AMERICANS should fear a “coup”. It takes Military men and their armed followers to oust the Tyrant. It will not happen by singing Kumbaya and praying for a miracle without shedding blood.

It also will not happen because people blindly repeat that we have a Constitution and we must all follow it. The process to remove a Tyrant was weakly worded in the Constitution and I consider it one of the BIG FLAWS. The Founding fathers made one major blundering assumption. That the elected Politicians of America would all have one thing in common. That they loved America and the Republic. They did not make provisions for a Trojan Horse Scenario.

That is why I trust our Righteous America Loving Military Leaders who have bled for our country in every war without asking for ANY part of the spoils.. EVER. As a group...They are most righteous fighting force in the HISTORY of the world

You immediately attach the word "Coup" to this action and it scares people into thinking that if the Military took over they would act Like Fidel Castro or Pinochet or some other tinpot dictator. Coup is a buzz word for most folks who really do not want to change the status quo. Remember George Washington led a Military Revolt/Coup.. that gained us independence.

HOWEVER ONLY THEY WITH OUR SUPPORT CAN REMOVE OUR CURRENT TYRANT AND HIS CABAL...

SO WHY AS A COMMANDER IN CHIEF AND NOT AS ANOTHER "PRESIDENT" YOU MIGHT ASK??

Because until we clean the political cesspool we do not need another Politician. We need a Commander who can make decisions without bowing to the progressive bureaucracies that are embedded with anti America Leftist, Pan African Anarchists, and Progressives.

We must restore the Constitution and it cannot be done without an interim time where a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN LEADER WITH THE STRONG BACKING OF THE MILITARY CAN HOLD AMERICA TOGETHER AND SET THE SHIP RIGHT..

Yes I know so Many Sincere and earnest Patriots talk about all kinds of ways... short of "Revolution" to Restore our Republic.

Things like the "States Convention" the "Countermand Convention" "Impeachment" etc etc...

All of these are "Intellectual Pipe Dreams" ... the Cabal is so firmly entrenched that the process will be sabotaged and will NEVER EVER COME TO FRUITION...

THE ONLY WE WAY TAKE BACK THE COUNTRY THIS LATE IN THE GAME IS REVOLUTION... IN SOME FORM OR ANOTHER!

No election of a Conservative Senate, Congress or President or Governors or Legislatures ...... is going to resolve the decayed underpinnings of the Constitutional Republic our country once was.

It needs a whole lot more work before any Patriotic "President" can do any meaningful work.

FACT:
The Bureaucracy and the Federal Judiciary is loaded with leftist Progressives and Socialists and unless and until we remove all of them through a Radical Bloodless/bloody Revolt.. all we will do is spend the next 30 years fighting against people with legal authority to enforce the mandate created by these crooks and ideologues over the past 90 years ...who have diametrically opposite views of what America should be than we do..

FACT:
WE CANNOT CO-EXIST WITH IDEOLOGIES THAT ARE POLAR OPPOSITES TO OURS. NOTICE AS SOON AS THEY LOSE THEY TALK ABOUT US WORKING WITH THEM. WHEN THEY HAVE THE POWER THEY DO WHAT THE HELL THEY WANT.

Electing a Conservative Senate, Congress or President or Governors or Legislatures whose hands are tied by Federal Judges and by Bureaucracies like the EPA, THE IRS, THE HHS etc that are also loaded with enemies of the Constitutional Republic is a WASTE OF TIME...and energy UNTIL we have completed the catharsis first.

That's a fact !! ONLY A REVOLUTION CLEANS THE SYSTEM. AN NON POLITICAL GENERAL WHO TILL NOW HAS SHOWN NO LONG TERM POLITICAL ASPIRATIONS AND HAS SHOWN LOVE OF COUNTRY IS WHAT WE NEED.

DON'T YOU AGREE??

Remember.. When the SHTF we have to have someone who is well known who can stand up and lead and have the Military come over to our side. The Military is tired of this Fake.

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!

Obama Fires Or Kills off Military Officers Because He 'Fears a Coup'

TIME FOR REVOLUTION:
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS.
 

We ask all fired Officers to please come to our side. Never in the History of our country have so many gallant and brave Soldiers been relieved of their command in such short order. This is destroying the morale of the real fighting men!

UPDATED APRIL 30 2015

Marine Corp Times Report:

The commanding officer of Marine Corps Base Hawaii was relieved of his duties Monday following “a loss of trust and confidence in his ability to lead,” the service said.

Col. Eric Schaefer, who assumed command of the base in August, was removed from his post by Maj. Gen. Charles Hudson, the commanding general of Marine Corps Installations Pacific, according to a Marine Corps news release. Schaefer was reassigned to another position effective immediately.

“The Marine Corps holds all Marines, especially commanders, responsible for their actions, and is committed to upholding high standards of honor, courage and commitment within the ranks,” the release states.

No additional details about the relief or Schaefer’s new position were immediately available. Schaefer could not immediately be reached for comment.

Col. Christopher Snyder, the deputy commander of Marine Corps Installations Pacific, has been assigned as the interim commanding officer of Marine Corps Base Hawaii until a permanent replacement is named by Headquarters Marine Corps.

Schaefer, a career aviator with more than 2,000 flight hours, graduated from San Diego State University in 1991, according to his official Marine Corps biography. He served as the commanding officer of Marine Attack Squadron 214, which was named the Marine aviation attack squadron of the year in 2009 following a deployment to Afghanistan’s Helmand province.

FULL STORY HERE

REPORTED BY US NAVY:

From Commander, Naval Surface Force U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs


SAN DIEGO (NNS) — The commanding officer of USS Lake Erie (CG 70) was relieved of his duties April 27, due to loss of confidence in his ability to command.
Capt. John Banigan was relieved by Rear Adm. Dee Mewbourne, commander of Carrier Strike Group 11. The decision was based on the findings of an investigation into poor command climate aboard Lake Erie, a guided-missile cruiser homeported in San Diego.
Banigan assumed command of the ship in May 2013. He has been temporarily assigned to the staff of Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet.
Capt. Douglas Kunzman, deputy commander of Destroyer Squadron 9, will temporarily assume command of Lake Erie pending assignment of a permanent relief.
FULL REPORT HERE
Collage
2 MILITARY COMMANDERS RELIEVED OF DUTY!

UPDATED MAY 25, 2014

The List of Senior Ranking Military Officers Forced Out By Barack Hussein Obama

Many of these below have spotless records, 25 and up years service, many medals and honors such as Brig. Gen Bryan W. Wampler and Command Sgt. Major Don B. Jordan.

Commanding Generals fired:


General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012)
Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013)
Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013)
Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013)
Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011)
Major General Charles M.M. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013)
General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013)
Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point, NY (2013)
Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013)
General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013)
Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico’s Security Battalion (Oct 2013)
General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010)
General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009)
General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012)
Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013)
Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013)
Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013)
Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013)
Commanding Admirals fired:
Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012)
Vice Admiral Tim Giardina(3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013)

Naval Officers fired: (All in 2011)


Captain David Geisler-U.S. Navy Commander Task Force 53 in Bahrain (Oct 2011)
Commander Laredo Bell-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs, NY (Aug 2011)
Lieutenant Commander Kurt Boenisch-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
Commander Nathan Borchers-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Stout (Mar 2011)
Commander Robert Brown-U.S. Navy Commander Beachmaster Unit 2 Fort Story, VA (Aug 2011)
Commander Andrew Crowe-Executive Officer Navy Region Center Singapore (Apr 2011)
Captain Robert Gamberg-Executive Officer carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (Jun 2011)
Captain Rex Guinn-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Legal Service office Japan (Feb 2011)
Commander Kevin Harms- U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 137 aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln (Mar 2011)
Lieutenant Commander Martin Holguin-U.S. Navy Commander mine countermeasures Fearless (Oct 2011)
Captain Owen Honors-U.S. Navy Commander aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (Jan 2011)
Captain Donald Hornbeck-U.S. Navy Commander Destroyer Squadron 1 San Diego (Apr 2011)
Rear Admiral Ron Horton-U.S. Navy Commander Logistics Group, Western Pacific (Mar 2011)
Commander Etta Jones-U.S. Navy Commander amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
Commander Ralph Jones-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Green Bay (Jul 2011)
Commander Jonathan Jackson-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 134, deployed aboard carrier Carl Vinson (Dec 2011)
Captain Eric Merrill-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Emory S. Land (Jul 2011)
Captain William Mosk-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Station Rota, U.S. Navy Commander Naval Activities Spain (Apr 2011)
Commander Timothy Murphy-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, WA (Apr 2011)
Commander Joseph Nosse-U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine Kentucky (Oct 2011)
Commander Mark Olson-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer The Sullivans FL (Sep 2011)
Commander John Pethel-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock New York (Dec 2011)
Commander Karl Pugh-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 141 Whidbey Island, WA (Jul 2011)
Commander Jason Strength-U.S. Navy Commander of Navy Recruiting District Nashville, TN (Jul 2011)
Captain Greg Thomas-U.S. Navy Commander Norfolk Naval Shipyard (May 2011)
Commander Mike Varney-U.S. Navy Commander attack submarine Connecticut (Jun 2011)
Commander Jay Wylie-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Momsen (Apr 2011)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2012):
Commander Alan C. Aber-Executive Officer Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71 (July 2012)
Commander Derick Armstrong- U.S. Navy Commander missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (May 2012)
Commander Martin Arriola- U.S. Navy Commander destroyer USS Porter (Aug 2012)
Captain Antonio Cardoso- U.S. Navy Commander Training Support Center San Diego (Sep 2012)
Captain James CoBell- U.S. Navy Commander Oceana Naval Air Station’s Fleet Readiness Center Mid-Atlantic (Sep 2012)
Captain Joseph E. Darlak- U.S. Navy Commander frigate USS Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
Captain Daniel Dusek-U.S. Navy Commander USS Bonhomme
Commander David Faught-Executive Officer destroyer Chung-Hoon (Sep 2012)
Commander Franklin Fernandez- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24 (Aug 2012)
Commander Ray Hartman- U.S. Navy Commander Amphibious dock-landing ship Fort McHenry (Nov 2012)
Commander Shelly Hakspiel-Executive Officer Navy Drug Screening Lab San Diego (May 2012)
Commander Jon Haydel- U.S. Navy Commander USS San Diego (Mar 2012)
Commander Diego Hernandez- U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming (Feb 2012)
Commander Lee Hoey- U.S. Navy Commander Drug Screening Laboratory, San Diego (May 2012)
Commander Ivan Jimenez-Executive Officer frigate Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
Commander Dennis Klein- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Columbia (May 2012)
Captain Chuck Litchfield- U.S. Navy Commander assault ship USS Essex (Jun 2012)
Captain Marcia Kim Lyons- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic New England (Apr 2012)
Captain Robert Marin- U.S. Navy Commander cruiser USS Cowpens (Feb 2012)
Captain Sean McDonell- U.S. Navy Commander Seabee reserve unit Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 14 FL (Nov 2012)
Commander Corrine Parker- U.S. Navy Commander Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 1 (Apr 2012)
Captain Liza Raimondo- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic Patuxent River, MD (Jun 2012)
Captain Jeffrey Riedel- Program manager, Littoral Combat Ship program (Jan 2012)
Commander Sara Santoski- U.S. Navy Commander Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 15 (Sep 2012)
Commander Kyle G. Strudthoff-Executive Officer Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 25 (Sep 2012)
Commander Sheryl Tannahill- U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Nashville, TN (Sep 2012)
Commander Michael Ward- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Pittsburgh (Aug 2012)
Captain Michael Wiegand- U.S. Navy Commander Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (Nov 2012)
Captain Ted Williams- U.S. Navy Commander amphibious command ship Mount Whitney (Nov 2012)
Commander Jeffrey Wissel- U.S. Navy Commander of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 (Feb 2012)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2013):
Lieutenant Commander Lauren Allen-Executive Officer submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013)
Reserve Captain Jay Bowman-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Fort Dix, NJ (Mar 2013)
Captain William Cogar-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Mercy’s medical treatment facility (Sept 2013)
Commander Steve Fuller-Executive Officer frigate Kauffman (Mar 2013)
Captain Shawn Hendricks-Program Manager for naval enterprise IT networks (June 2013)
Captain David Hunter-U.S. Navy Commander of Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron 12 & Coastal Riverine Group 2 (Feb 2013)
Captain Eric Johnson-U.S. Navy Chief of Military Entrance Processing Command at Great Lakes Naval Training Center, IL (2013)
Captain Devon Jones-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Air Facility El Centro, CA (July 2013)
Captain Kevin Knoop-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Comfort’s medical treatment facility (Aug 2013)
Lieutenant Commander Jack O’Neill-U.S. Navy Commander Operational Support Center Rock Island, IL (Mar 2013)
Commander Allen Maestas-Executive Officer Beachmaster Unit 1 (May 2013)
Commander Luis Molina-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Pasadena (Jan 2013)
Commander James Pickens-Executive Officer frigate Gary (Feb 2013)
Lieutenant Commander Mark Rice-U.S. Navy Commander Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013)
Commander Michael Runkle-U.S. Navy Commander of Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit 2 (May 2013)
Commander Jason Stapleton-Executive Office Patrol Squadron 4 in Hawaii (Mar 2013)
Commander Nathan Sukols-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013)
Lieutenant Daniel Tyler-Executive Officer Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013)
Commander Edward White-U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 106 (Aug 2013)
Captain Jeffrey Winter-U.S. Navy Commander of Carrier Air Wing 17 (Sept 2013)
Commander Thomas Winter-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Montpelier (Jan 2013)
Commander Corey Wofford- U.S. Navy Commander frigate Kauffman (Feb 2013)

157 Air Force majors forced into early terminations, no retirement or benefits, all were within six years of retirement.

Update Nov 12

Vice Adm. Ted Branch and Rear Adm. Bruce F. Loveless have both taken forced leaves of absence and had their access to classified materials suspended.

The news comes on the heels of the reports that at least two Navy commanders allegedly leaked inside information to Malaysian businessman Leonard Glenn Francis -- chief executive of the contractor Glenn Defense Marine Asia, which resupplies ships and submarines across Asia.
Federal prosecutors are reportedly accusing Navy Cmdr. Michael Vannak Khem Misiewicz, 46, of tipping off Francis to the worldwide movement of Navy ships so his company could obtain contracts to service those vessels at port.
Also reportedly arrested was Naval Criminal Investigative Service supervisory Special Agent John Beliveau, 44, who allegedly (and secretly) downloaded reports on his agency’s investigation into Glenn Defense Marine Asia -- and how it won a $125 million contract to service naval ships at ports of  call.
Such information allegedly allowed the company to bilk the U.S. government of more money – and even secure more contracts worth up to $200 million -- as it defended itself from the Navy's criminal investigations. 
The Post wrote in a past report that in return for the ill-gotten information, Glenn Defense Marine also supplied the officers with prostitutes, cash, luxury hotel rooms, plane tickets, and even tickets to a Lady Gaga concert in Thailand.
According to The Post, neither Branch nor Loveless has as-yet been charged with a crime or service violation, or been demoted. As director of naval intelligence, Branch serves as the Navy’s top intelligence officer.

But the paper cited a Navy official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, as saying the Naval Criminal Intelligence Service unearthed evidence of “personal misconduct,” by Branch and Loveless as part of the larger investigation into Glenn Defense Marine.
And the paper adds the alleged improprieties predate either man’s promotion to their current positions.
“We do believe that other naval officers will likely be implicated in this scandal,” Rear Adm. John F. Kirby, the Navy’s chief spokesman, told The Post in a telephone interview.


UPDATE NOV 10 2013 

3-star Navy admiral fired as deputy chief of nuclear command, demoted to 2-star rank

 This image provided by the U.S. Navy shows Navy Vice Adm. Tim Giardina in a Nov. 11, 2011, photo. The Navy says a Giardina was notified Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2013, that he has been relieved of duty as second-in-command at the military organization that oversees all U.S. nuclear forces. Giardina will drop in rank to two-star admiral as a consequence of being removed from his position at U.S. Strategic Command. He is under investigation in a gambling matter. (AP Photo/U.S. Navy) (The Associated Press)

The deputy commander of U.S. nuclear forces, Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, was notified Wednesday that he has been relieved of duty amid a military investigation of allegations that he used counterfeit chips at an Iowa casino, the Navy said.
The move is exceedingly rare and perhaps unprecedented in the history of U.S. Strategic Command, which is responsible for all U.S. nuclear warfighting forces, including nuclear-armed submarines, bombers and land-based missiles.
The Navy's top spokesman, Rear Adm. John Kirby, said Giardina, who had held the job since December 2011, is being reassigned to the Navy staff pending the outcome of the probe by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, which originated as a local law enforcement investigation in Iowa in June.
As a consequence of being removed from his post at Strategic Command, Giardina falls in rank to two-star admiral. He had been suspended by Gen. Robert Kehler, the top commander at Strategic Command, on Sept. 3, although that move was not disclosed publicly until Sept. 28.
After his suspension Giardina remained at Strategic Command but was not allowed to perform duties that required use of his security clearance.
The decision to take the next step — to relieve him of duty — was made on Oct. 3, one official said. That required approval by President Barack Obama, two defense officials said. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the internal decision-making.
Kehler had recommended to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel that Giardina be relieved of duty and returned to the Navy, according to Pentagon spokesman Carl Woog.
A former commander of Strategic Command, retired Air Force Gen. Eugene Habiger, said he believes this is the first time in the history of the command that a deputy commander has been relieved of duty. Strategic Command was created in 1992 at the end of the Cold War. The aim was to unify the command of nuclear forces previously run separately by the Air Force and the Navy.
"I know of no other case ever of a deputy commander who was relieved for cause," Habiger said in a telephone interview. He headed the command from 1996-98.

UPDATED OCTOBER 31 2013:


 



BREAKING....ANOTHER OBAMA ASSASSINATION!

USAF General Brown Dies in Mysterious Crash today: He was Investigating MISSING NUKES!

The plane went down in a subdivision near the Williamsburg/Jamestown Airport 


Two people, including a Major General in the United States Air Force, were killed Friday afternoon when a small plane crashed in the Williamsburg area.
WAVY, citing Virginia State Police, reported that Major General Joseph D. Brown IV, 54, had died in the crash, along with a female passenger and a family pet. The woman’s name was not released.
Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Kathleen Bergen described the plane as a Cessna 210 that went down about a half-mile from the Williamsburg/Jamestown airport in a subdivision. No injuries were reported on the ground.
Read More
Prior to assuming his current position, he served as the Deputy Director for Nuclear Operations, U.S. Strategic Command, Offutt Air Force Base, Neb. In this capacity, he was the principal adviser to the commander on issues pertaining to strategic deterrence and nuclear operations and was responsible for management and oversight of the nuclear enterprise overseeing personnel, procedural, equipment, communications and facility requirements supporting the nuclear command and control system. The general is a command pilot with more than 4,300 hours, primarily in the B-1 and B-52, including combat time in operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom.

YOU CANNOT BELIEVE ALL THESE ARE ACCIDENTS..

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Detailed Timeline of the Illegal Acts by Obama from 2009 to give amensty to illegals, to dilute America's legal Population

TIME LINE OF HOW OBAMA AND HIS SOCIALIST CABAL ARE DISMANTLING AMERICA THROUGH ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND AMNESTY.. 

this is a plan to dilute America's legal Population


Timeline: How the Obama Administration Bypassed Congress to Dismantle Immigration Enforcement
In September 2011, President Obama said, “We live in a democracy. You have to pass bills through the legislature, and then I can sign it.” Yet, since that time, and indeed before then, he has systematically voided existing laws and unilaterally created new measures that Congress has refused to adopt under either Democratic or Republican control. 
Most recently, the President announced he would do what he once said only an “emperor” could do – grant unilateral amnesty, work permits, and access to government benefits to more than five million illegal immigrants. This unprecedented action, combined with new “enforcement priorities” for Department of Homeland Security personnel that exempt the vast majority of illegal immigrants from the threat of removal, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals directive, the “Morton” memos, and numerous other lesser-reported but far-reaching Executive actions, has threatened not only our constitutional system, but our national sovereignty. Indeed, the idea of national, sovereign borders is being daily eviscerated by the President’s determination to write his own immigration rules in defiance of Congress and the American people. 
Below is a detailed timeline of how the Obama Administration systematically dismantled immigration enforcement, undermining the very rule of law upon which our nation was founded and upon which its greatness depends.
January 2009:  Obama Administration Ends Worksite Enforcement Actions
In early 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) executes a raid (initiated and planned under the Bush Administration) on an engine machine shop in Bellingham, Washington, detaining 28 illegal immigrants who were using fake Social Security numbers and identity documents. Shortly thereafter, pro-amnesty groups criticized the Administration for enforcing the law. An unnamed DHS official is quoted in the Washington Times as saying, “the Secretary is not happy about it and this is not her policy.”  Instead of enforcing the law, the Secretary investigates the ICE agents for simply doing their duty. Esther Olavarria, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security, says on a call with employers and pro-amnesty groups that “we’re not doing raids or audits under this administration.” 
January 29, 2009:  Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano Delays E-Verify Deadline 
Former Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano delays the original deadlines for federal contractors to use the E-Verify system, from January 15, 2009, and February 20, 2009, to May 21, 2009.
April 16, 2009:  Secretary Napolitano Delays E-Verify Deadline a Second Time 
Secretary Napolitano again delays the deadline for federal contractors to use E-Verify, this time to June 30, 2009. 
June 3, 2009:  Secretary Napolitano Delays E-Verify Deadline a Third Time 
For the third time, Secretary Napolitano delays the deadline for federal contractors to use E-Verify to September 8, 2009. 
March 8, 2010:  ICE Inflates Deportation Statistics
According to the Washington Post:  “Months after reporting that the number of illegal immigrants removed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement increased 47 percent during President Obama’s first year in office, the Department of Homeland Security on Monday corrected the record, saying the actual increase in those deported and ‘voluntary departures’ was 5 percent.” 
March 16, 2010:  DHS Announces Termination of Funding for Virtual Fence along Southwestern Border 
Secretary Napolitano announces that, effective immediately, DHS would redeploy $50 million of stimulus funding originally allocated for virtual fence technology because “the system of sensors and cameras along the Southwest border known as SBInet has been plagued with cost overruns and missed deadlines.” 
May 19, 2010:  ICE Director John Morton Announces Termination of Cooperation with Arizona Law Enforcement
In an interview with the Chicago Tribune, the former Director of ICE, John Morton, states that ICE will not even process or accept illegal immigrants transferred to ICE custody by Arizona law enforcement, largely because the Obama Administration disagrees with Arizona’s immigration law, which made it a crime to be in the state illegally and required police to check suspects for immigration documents. 
May 27, 2010:  Internal ICE Emails Reveal Relaxed Security and New Benefits for Detained Illegal Immigrants
Internal ICE emails reveal that “low-risk” immigration detainees will be able to have visitors stay for an unlimited amount of time during a 12-hour window, be given access to unmonitored phone lines, email, free internet calling, movie nights, bingo, arts and crafts, dance and cooking classes, tutoring, and computer training.
June 18, 2010:  Obama Administration Sues Arizona over Immigration Enforcement Law
The Obama Administration announces that it will sue Arizona to block the implementation of the state’s immigration enforcement law. 
June 25, 2010:  ICE Union Casts Unanimous Vote of “No Confidence” in Agency Leadership
The National ICE Council, the union representing more than 7,000 agents and officers, casts a unanimous vote of “No Confidence” in ICE Director Morton and Assistant Director Phyllis Coven, citing “the growing dissatisfaction and concern among ICE employees and Union Leaders that Director Morton and Assistant Director Coven have abandoned the Agency’s core mission of enforcing United States Immigration Laws and providing for public safety, and have instead directed their attention to campaigning for programs and policies related to amnesty.” The union lists some of the policies that led to the vote of No Confidence:
“Senior ICE leadership dedicates more time to campaigning for immigration reforms aimed at large scale amnesty legislation, than advising the American public and Federal lawmakers on the severity of the illegal immigration problem . . . ICE [Enforcement and Removal Operations are] currently overwhelmed by the massive criminal alien problem in the United States resulting in the large-scale release of criminals back into local communities.”
“Criminal aliens openly brag to ICE officers that they are taking advantage of the broken immigration system and will be back in the United States within days to commit crimes, while United States citizens arrested for the same offenses serve prison sentences. . . . Thousands of other criminal aliens are released to ICE without being tried for their criminal charges. ICE senior leadership is aware that the system is broken, yet refuses to alert Congress to the severity of the situation . . . .”
“ICE is misleading the American public with regard to the effectiveness of criminal enforcement programs like the ICE ‘Secure Communities Program’ using it as a selling point to move forward with amnesty related legislation.”
“While ICE reports internally that more than 90 percent of ICE detainees are first encountered by ICE in jails after they are arrested by local police for criminal charges, ICE senior leadership misrepresents this information publicly in order to portray ICE detainees as being non-criminal in nature to support the Administration’s position on amnesty and relaxed security at ICE detention facilities.”
“The majority of ICE ERO Officers are prohibited from making street arrests or enforcing United States immigration laws outside of the institutional (jail) setting. This has effectively created ‘amnesty through policy’ for anyone illegally in the United States who has not been arrested by another agency for a criminal violation.”
“ICE Detention Reforms have transformed into a detention system aimed at providing resort like living conditions to criminal aliens. Senior ICE leadership excluded ICE officers and field managers (the technical experts on ICE detention) from the development of these reforms, and instead solicited recommendations from special interest groups. . . . Unlike any other agency in the nation, ICE officers will be prevented from searching detainees housed in ICE facilities allowing weapons, drugs and other contraband into detention centers putting detainees, ICE officers and contract guards at risk.”
July 14, 2010:  Obama Administration Ignores Dangerous Sanctuary City Policies 
Less than a week after suing Arizona to block its immigration law, the Department of Justice announces that it will not take legal action against sanctuary cities, with a spokeswoman stating:  “There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law.” 
July 30, 2010:  Leaked U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Memo Reveals Obama Backdoor Amnesty Plan 
A leaked USCIS memo to agency Director Alejandro Mayorkas details the Obama administration’s plan to bypass Congress and grant amnesty by executive fiat. The memo, entitled “Administrative Alternatives to Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” suggests a number of unilateral actions to “reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization” and “extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups,” including many that Obama has since implemented and many that appeared in the Senate comprehensive immigration bill (S. 744, 113th Congress). 
August 2010:  ICE Memo Stops Agents from Detaining Illegal Immigrants During Traffic Stops 
In August 2010, ICE begins internally circulating a draft policy that would significantly limit the circumstances under which ICE could detain illegal immigrants. In effect, ICE agents are no longer authorized to stop/detain an illegal immigrant for illegally entering the country or for possessing false identification documents. Now, illegal immigrants can be detained only if another law enforcement agency makes an arrest for a criminal violation.  
August 24, 2010:  DHS Begins Closing and Dismissing Deportation Cases 
The Houston Chronicle reports that DHS has begun “systematically reviewing thousands of pending immigration cases and moving to dismiss those filed against suspected illegal immigrants without serious criminal records.” 
September 8, 2010:  Obama Administration Files Supreme Court Brief Supporting Challenge to Arizona’s E-Verify Law
The Obama Administration argues that the Supreme Court should strike down Arizona’s 2007 E-Verify law—a law enacted by the state’s former Governor, and the current Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. The law required all employers in the state to use E-Verify and revoked business licenses of those who hired illegal workers. The Supreme Court upholds the law in May 2011, finding that it was not preempted, because “although Congress had made the program voluntary at the national level, it had expressed no intent to prevent States from mandating participation.” 
September 16, 2010:  Leaked DHS Memo Reveals President Obama’s Long-Term Plan to Circumvent Congress and Grant “Broad Based” Amnesty
A leaked 10-page memo, dated February 26, 2010, details how the Obama administration had “long envisioned” a two-phase “broad based” amnesty plan “legalizing those who qualify and intend to stay here.” The memo states that “during Phase 1, eligible applicants would be registered, fingerprinted, screened and considered for an interim status that allows them to work in the U.S. . . . During Phase 2, applicants who had fulfilled additional statutory requirements would be permitted to become lawful permanent residents [i.e., obtain green cards].” The memo asserts that the Administration could proceed “in the absence of legislation,” e.g., deferred action; deferred enforced departure; waiver of inadmissibility for certain illegal immigrants; parole-in-place. Remarkably, the memo contemplates the pros and cons of such unprecedented executive action: 
“A registration program can be messaged as a security measure to bring illegal immigrants out of the shadows.”
“A bold administrative program would transform the political landscape by using administrative measures to sidestep the current state of Congressional gridlock and inertia.” 
“The Secretary would face criticism that she is abdicating her charge to enforce the immigration laws. Internal complaints of this type from career DHS officers are likely and may also be used in the press to bolster criticism.”
“Even many who have supported a legislated legalization program may question the legitimacy of trying to accomplish the same end via administrative action, particularly after five years where the two parties have treated this as a matter to be decided in Congress.”
“A program that reaches the entire population targeted for legalization would represent use of deferred action far beyond its limited class-based uses in the past (e.g. for widows). Congress may react by amending the statute to bar or greatly trim back on deferred action authority, blocking its use even for its highly important current uses in limited cases.”
“Congress could also simply negate the grant of deferred action (which by its nature is temporary and revocable) to this population. If criticism about the legitimacy of the program gain[s] traction, many supporters of legalization may find it hard to vote against such a bill.”
“The proposed timeline would require a rapid expansion of USCIS’s current application intake capacity. Significant upfront resources would be needed for hiring, training, facilities expansion and technology acquisition, and the only realistic prospect of a source of funding may be a new appropriation.”
“Immigration reform is a lightning rod that many Members of Congress would rather avoid. An administrative solution could dampen future efforts for comprehensive reform and sideline the issue in Congress indefinitely.”
“Done right, a combination of benefit and enforcement-related administrative measures could provide the Administration with a clear-cut political win. If the Administration loses control of the message, however, an aggressive administrative proposal carries significant political risk.” 
“More ambitious measures would have to be carefully timed. We would need to give the legislative process enough time to play out to deflect against charges of usurping congressional authority. . . . This is likely to mean that the right time for administrative action will be late summer or fall [2010]—when the midterm election is in full-swing.” 
“The President could make the case that the nation’s economic and national security can wait no longer for Congress. Administrative action is necessary to restores [sic] rule of law by ending illegal hiring, requiring individuals who are unlawfully present to pass background checks or get deported, and guaranteeing that all employers and workers are paying their fair share of taxes. Clearing backlogs of family-based visas would be an added bonus.”
“If the American public reacts poorly to an administrative registration effort, Congress could be motivated to enact legislation tying the Administration’s hands. This could result, in the worst case scenario, in legislation that diminishes the Secretary’s discretion to use parole or deferred action in other contexts. A heated fight could also poison the atmosphere for any future legislative reform effort.”
October 17, 2010:  DHS Dismissals of Deportation Cases Up 700 Percent 
The Houston Chronicle reports that the government dismissed, on its own motion, hundreds of deportation cases—up 700 percent between July and August 2010. The article states that “government attorneys in Houston were instructed to exercise prosecutorial discretion on a case-by-case basis for illegal immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for at least two years and have no serious criminal history.” 
December 2010:  Internal ICE Emails Reveal Padded Deportation Statistics
On October 8, 2010, Secretary Napolitano and ICE Director Morton announced that in 2010, ICE had “removed more illegal aliens than in any other period in the history of our nation.” On December 6, 2010, however, the Washington Post reports that internal ICE emails show that ICE padded its deportation statistics by including 19,422 removals from the previous fiscal year. The article also describes how ICE extended a Mexican repatriation program beyond its normal operation dates, adding 6,500 to its final removal numbers. 
February 15, 2011:  DHS Ignores Mandate to Maintain Operational Control of Border
During a hearing before the House Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, Chair Candice Miller announces that, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), U.S. Customs and Border Protection maintains operational control of only 69 of the roughly 4,000 miles along the northern border and only 873 of the almost 2,000 miles along the southwestern border. Under the Secure Fence Act of 2006, Congress required DHS to achieve and maintain operational control, which is defined as “the prevention of all unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband.” 
March 2, 2011:  Morton Amnesty Memo #1 
In the first of a series of memos, ICE Director Morton outlines new enforcement “priorities”—convicted criminals, terrorists, gang members, recent illegal entrants, and fugitives. The memo encourages ICE employees to exercise prosecutorial discretion for illegal immigrants who do not meet these “priorities,” and directs ICE field office directors to not “expend detention resources” on certain illegal immigrants. 
March 30, 2011:  9/11 Commission Chair Warns that Obama Administration’s Delay of Implementation of Biometric Exit System and REAL ID Act Risk National Security
Testifying before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean warns that “border security remains a top national security priority, because there is an indisputable nexus between terrorist operations and terrorist travel. Foreign-born terrorists have continued to exploit our border vulnerabilities to gain access to the United States.” In his testimony, he highlights two programs that the Obama Administration has delayed:  
“[F]ull deployment of the biometric exit component of US-VISIT should be a high priority. If law enforcement and intelligence officials had known for certain in August and September 2001 that 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar remained in the U.S., the search for them might have taken on greater urgency.” 
 . . . 
“[N]o further delay [in compliance with the REAL ID Act] should be authorized, rather compliance should be accelerated.”
May 10, 2011:  President Obama Declares Border Secure and Border Fence “Basically Complete”
In a speech in El Paso, Texas, Obama claims that his administration has “strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible” and that the border fence “is now basically complete,” despite the fact that only 33.7 miles of the 700 miles of fence mandated by the Secure Fence Act of 2006 had been completed by that time. Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee Michael McCaul responds, stating “the border is not secure and it has never been more violent or dangerous. Anyone who lives down there will tell you that.” 
June 1, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores New York’s Refusal to Cooperate with Federal Immigration Agents
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announces he is suspending New York’s participation in the Secure Communities program, which allows law enforcement agencies to run the fingerprints of those arrested against immigration databases, because of “its impact on families, immigrant communities and law enforcement in New York.” The Obama Administration takes no action. 
June 17, 2011:  Morton Amnesty Memos #2 and #3 
ICE Director Morton issues a second memo further directing ICE agents not to enforce the law against certain segments of the illegal immigrant population, including those who would qualify for the DREAM Act, despite having no legal authority to do so and despite the fact that Congress had explicitly rejected the legislation three times. On the same day, Morton also issues a third memo instructing ICE personnel to refrain from enforcing the law against individuals engaging in “protected activity” related to civil or other rights (for example, union organizing or complaining to authorities about employment discrimination or housing conditions). 
June 23, 2011:  ICE Union Outraged Over Morton Amnesty Memos 
The ICE union issues a press release expressing outrage over Director Morton’s actions, stating:  “Unable to pass its immigration agenda through legislation, the Administration is now implementing it through agency policy.” The release further states that ICE leadership and the Administration “have excluded our union and our agents from the entire process of developing policies, it was all kept secret from us, we found out from the newspapers. ICE [leadership] worked hand-in-hand with immigrants rights groups, but excluded its own officers.” Describing ICE policy as a “law enforcement nightmare,” union president Chris Crane states “the result is a means for every person here illegally to avoid arrest or detention, as officers we will never know who we can or cannot arrest.” The release concludes:  “we are asking everyone to please email or call your Congressman and Senators immediately and ask them to help stop what’s happening at ICE, we desperately need your help.”
June 27, 2011:  DHS Cover-Up of Backdoor Amnesty Policy Revealed 
The Houston Chronicle reports that internal ICE emails and memos show that DHS “officials misled the public and Congress in an effort to downplay a wave of immigration case dismissals in Houston and other cities that they had created a ‘back-door amnesty.’” These internal emails and memos revealed that this backdoor amnesty was instituted and encouraged at the direction of top ICE officials, including Riah Ramlogan, a high-ranking attorney at ICE subsequently named in a lawsuit by an award-winning ICE attorney in November 2014. In one instance, DHS Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs Nelson Peacock wrote a letter to several members of the Senate Judiciary Committee denying the existence of a directive “instructing ICE attorneys to seek the dismissals of immigration proceedings involving certain classes of criminal aliens”—a directive which not only existed, but had been praised by senior ICE officials. 
August 1, 2011:  Obama Administration Sues Alabama over Immigration Enforcement Law
The Obama Administration files a lawsuit to block implementation of Alabama’s immigration enforcement law, which authorizes state law enforcement to act when they reasonably suspect individuals are violating federal immigration laws. 
August 18, 2011:  Obama Administration Begins Review of Deportation Cases for Purposes of Granting Executive Amnesty 
In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Secretary Napolitano announces that the Obama Administration had begun a review of all pending and incoming deportation cases and will stop proceedings against those illegal immigrants who do not meet administration “priorities.”
September 2, 2011:  Treasury Inspector General Reports Government Paying Billions in Tax Credits to Illegal Immigrants
A report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reveals that the IRS paid out a staggering $4.2 billion in refundable tax credits to illegal immigrants via the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) in 2010. The inspector general states:  “Millions of people are seeking this tax credit who, we believe, are not entitled to it. We have made recommendations to the IRS as to how they could address this, and they have not taken sufficient action in our view to solve this problem.” The report further states that “the payment of Federal funds through this tax benefit appears to provide an additional incentive for aliens to enter, reside, and work in the United States without authorization, which contradicts Federal law and policy to remove such incentives.” 
September 7, 2011:  Cook County (Chicago), Illinois Board of Commissioners Votes to Ignore Federal Immigration Law
The Cook County Board of Commissioners passes an ordinance directing local law enforcement to refuse ICE detainer requests and access to individuals or County facilities. While ICE Director Morton acknowledges that the ordinance poses a serious threat to public safety and likely violates federal law, the Administration’s only action is to offer to pay Cook County to honor the detainers and to set up a “working group,” both of which the Board rejects. ICE’s Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations says the policy presents a major problem for enforcement efforts and is an “accident waiting to happen.”
In June 2011, Saul Chavez, who had a prior DUI conviction, was driving with a blood-alcohol content of nearly four times the legal limit when he hits and kills 66-year-old William “Dennis” McCann. While attempting to escape, Chavez drove his car over McCann’s body, dragging him 200 yards before a witness stopped his vehicle. Chavez was charged with two felonies, and ICE issued a detainer asking Cook County to hold him until he could be taken into federal custody. But, pursuant to Cook County’s new anti-detainer law, he was released when he posted 10 percent of his $250,000 bail.  He has since disappeared and is believed to have fled the country.
September 28, 2011:  President Obama Admits Deportation Statistics are “Deceptive” 
At a roundtable with amnesty advocates, President Obama admits that his deportation statistics are misleading:  “The statistics are actually a little deceptive because what we’ve been doing is . . . apprehending folks at the borders and sending them back.  That is counted as a deportation, even though they may have only been held for a day or 48 hours.”
October 18, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores Santa Clara County’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law 
The Obama Administration refuses to take action when the Santa Clara County, California, Board of Supervisors votes to stop using county funds to honor ICE detainers, except in limited circumstances. Santa Clara County’s failure to cooperate with Secure Communities continues to this day.
In August 2013, illegal immigrant Mario Chavez was arrested after threatening his 6-year-old son with a knife. His wife obtained a protective order but Chavez made bail and was released from jail instead of being held for further investigation by ICE. A month later, Chavez went to his family’s new home where he then stabbed his wife to death. According to San Jose Mercury News, ICE officials “contend they could have kept Chavez off the streets,” but the county’s policy limits access that ICE has to inmates. The official reportedly said, “We’re not asking them to do our job. We’re asking them to let us do our job.”
October 18, 2011:  ICE Continues to Pad Deportation Statistics 
ICE announces its year-end deportation statistics, which it described as “the largest number in the agency’s history.” However, according to the 2010 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, published by DHS’s Office of Immigration Statistics, ICE is detaining far fewer illegal immigrants than ever before, locating fewer than half the number of deportable aliens in 2010 than it did in 2006. 
October 19, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores Washington, D.C.’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law 
The Obama Administration refuses to act when District of Columbia Mayor Vincent C. Gray issues an order to prevent local law enforcement from enforcing federal immigration laws. In June 2012, the D.C. Council unanimously votes to further restrict cooperation with ICE, requiring that suspected illegal immigrants can be detained only if they have prior convictions for violent crimes, among other things. According to the Washington Post, a spokeswoman for ICE states that “ICE has not sought to compel compliance through legal proceedings. Jurisdictions that ignore detainers bear the risk of possible public safety risks.”
October 28, 2011:  Obama Administration Stops Routine Border Searches 
According to the Associated Press, Border Patrol field offices nationwide receive orders from DHS headquarters to stop regular inspections at transportation hubs—both at the border and in the interior of the country—such as random stops and investigations of suspicious behavior, and instead act only based on actual intelligence indicating a threat. The article notes that “halting the practice has baffled agents” who said it was “an effective way to catch unlawful immigrants, including smugglers and possible terrorists.” The National Border Patrol Council, the union representing Border Patrol agents, responds to the changes:  “Stated plainly, Border Patrol mangers are increasing the layers of bureaucracy and making it as difficult as possible for Border Patrol agents to conduct their core duties. The only risks being managed by this move are too many apprehensions, negative media attention and complaints generated by immigrant rights groups.”
October 31, 2011:  Obama Administration Sues South Carolina over Immigration Enforcement Law 
The Justice Department files suit against South Carolina, challenging the state’s immigration enforcement law. 
November 7, 2011:  USCIS Stops Issuing “Notices to Appear” in Immigration Court for “Non-Priority” Deportation Cases
Following ICE’s lead, USCIS Director Mayorkas issues a new Policy Memorandum stating that USCIS will no longer issue place illegal immigrants into removal proceedings by issuing “Notices to Appear” in immigration court for illegal immigrants who do not meet the Administration’s deportation “priorities.”
November 17, 2011:  ICE Announces Review of Entire Immigration Court Docket to Close More Deportation Cases
Although it had previously denied the existence of a program involving the dismissal and closure of cases in its Houston office, the ICE Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) issues a new policy memorandum instructing all agency attorneys to “begin a review of incoming cases and cases pending in immigration court” and identify the cases eligible for “prosecutorial discretion in the form of administrative closure,” i.e., executive amnesty.
November 22, 2011:  Obama Administration Sues Utah over Immigration Enforcement Law 
The Obama Administration files a lawsuit to block provisions of Utah’s immigration enforcement law. This is the fourth lawsuit by the Administration against a state that enacted such a law.
November 22, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores New York City’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg signs a measure directing city jails to ignore certain requests by ICE to maintain custody of illegal immigrants, so as to give ICE the opportunity to assume custody. To date, the Obama Administration has taken no action against New York City to compel compliance. 
December 11, 2011:  Reports Surface that President Obama to Reduce National Guard Presence on Border 
According to several reports, the Obama Administration plans to reduce the 1,200 National Guard troops stationed along the southwestern border. From 2006 to 2008, under the Bush Administration, thousands of troops worked along the border as part of “Operation Jumpstart” to free up Border Patrol to focus on border security. On April 17, 2012, the Obama Administration implements its plan and reduces the number of National Guard to 300; there are currently about 130 stationed on the border.
December 15, 2011:  DHS Rescinds Maricopa County, Arizona’s 287(g) Agreement
DHS rescinds Maricopa County, Arizona’s 287(g) agreement—a cooperative agreement whereby local law enforcement receive training in identifying and apprehending illegal aliens. Director Morton told the Maricopa County Attorney that ICE will no longer respond to calls from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office involving traffic stops, civil infractions, or “other minor offenses,” even though federal law requires the federal government to respond to inquiries by law enforcement agencies to verify immigration status. 
December 29, 2011:  ICE Creates 24-Hour Hotline for Illegal Immigrant Detainees
ICE announces a new 24-hour hotline for illegal immigrant detainees to ensure they “are made aware of their rights.” The hotline is to be staffed by the Law Enforcement Support Center, which ICE previously claimed was too understaffed to respond to local law enforcement trying to verify immigration status. ICE also revises its detainer form to include a new provision that says ICE should “consider this request for a detainer operative only upon the subject’s conviction”—a change in policy that explicitly ignores that illegal presence in the United States is a violation of federal law. 
January 5, 2012:  DHS Stops Secure Communities in Alabama in Retaliation for State Immigration Enforcement Law 
In an email from DHS to congressional offices, DHS reveals that it had stopped the roll-out of Secure Communities in Alabama because the Obama Administration disagreed with the state’s immigration enforcement law:  “Although the federal courts have enjoined several parts of H.B. 56, certain provisions were not enjoined and are currently in effect . . . While these provisions of Alabama’s state immigration enforcement law, which conflict with ICE’s immigration enforcement policies and programs, remain the subject of litigation, ICE does not believe it is appropriate to expand deployment of Secure Communities . . . in Alabama.”
January 6, 2012:  USCIS Announces Proposal to Permit Entire Segments of Illegal Immigrant Population to Remain in U.S. 
USCIS announces a proposed rule to allow illegal immigrant relatives of U.S. citizens to apply for waivers to remain in U.S., thereby avoiding the provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that require them to return to their home countries and apply for a waiver to return to the United States. On January 3, 2013, USCIS issues the final rule.  During a stakeholder call, USCIS Director Mayorkas emphasizes that USCIS will also consider expanding the waiver to illegal immigrant relatives of green card holders and clarifies that even illegal immigrants in deportation proceedings who had their case administratively closed are eligible for these waivers.  On January 24, 2014, USCIS issues field guidance for the program, instructing USCIS officers that an applicant with a criminal history is still eligible for a waiver as long as the offense qualifies as a “petty offense” or “youthful offender” exception under the INA, and is not a crime involving moral turpitude. 
January 9, 2012:  DHS Inspector General Reveals Rubberstamping of Immigration Applications 
A report by the DHS Inspector General reveals that USCIS officials pressure employees to approve applications that should have been denied, and that employees believe they do not have enough time to complete interviews of applicants, “leav[ing] ample opportunities for critical information to be overlooked. One [adjudicator] said that an [adjudicator] is likely to ‘grant and just move on,’ rather than use information to make a better determination in certain cases.” Ninety percent of those surveyed felt they did not have enough time to complete interviews of applicants.
January 16, 2012:  ICE Prosecutors Suspend Deportation Proceedings
Due to the immigration court docket review ordered by the OPLA in November 2011, proceedings in immigration courts in Denver and Baltimore are stopped for six weeks. On January 19, 2012, ICE prosecutors recommend the voluntary closure of 1,667 deportation cases. On March 30, 2012, the Administration announces the expansion of the program to Detroit, Seattle, New Orleans, and Orlando, suspending the immigration court dockets in four large cities.
January 19, 2012:  President Obama Uses Executive Order to Eliminate Statutory Requirement for Visa Interviews for Certain Countries
President Obama issues an Executive Order attempting to nullify a longstanding statutory requirement that those applying for a nonimmigrant visa (in a foreign country) submit to an in-person interview with a consular officer. The President’s Executive Order waives these requirements for travelers from China and Brazil, increasing the potential for visa overstays and risking national security and law enforcement threats.
February 7, 2012:  ICE Creates “Public Advocate” for Illegal Immigrants 
ICE announces the creation of the ICE Public Advocate, who is to serve as a point of contact for aliens in removal proceedings, community and advocacy groups, and others who have questions, recommendations, or other issues they would like to raise about the Administration’s enforcement and executive amnesty efforts. 
February 13, 2012:  President Obama’s Budget Slashes 287(g) Program
The President’s FY2013 budget proposes a massive cut in funding for ICE and the 287(g) program, effectively gutting it. 
April 25, 2012:  ICE Voluntarily Dismisses Over 16,500 Deportation Cases
ICE announces that it will voluntarily close over 16,500 deportation cases in connection with the Obama Administration’s larger review of 300,000 cases. The Administration also announces that the number of illegal immigrants whose deportation cases it has already dismissed is up to 2,700 from just over 1,500 the previous month.
April 25, 2012:  DHS Announces Another Delay of Biometric Exit System 
In March 2012, DHS Principal Deputy Coordinator of Counterterrorism John Cohen had testified before the House Committee on Homeland Security that DHS’s plan to implement the statutorily-required biometric exit system will be completed in the next 30 days. However, on April 25, 2012, Secretary Napolitano testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee that DHS will be able to deploy such a system “within four years” and then only if DHS determines that it is cost-effective. Dating back to 1996, Congress has mandated six times that this system be implemented and the 9/11 Commission recommended that DHS complete this system “as quickly as possible.”
April 27, 2012:  Obama Administration Undermines the Successful Secure Communities Program
ICE announces that it will no longer ask local jails to detain illegal immigrants stopped for “minor traffic offenses,” weakening the effective Secure Communities program. Instead, ICE will consider detaining an alien only if the alien is ultimately convicted of an offense. Also, despite claims of limited resources, ICE announces it plans to take action against jurisdictions with arrest rates the agency deems too high.

June 5, 2012:  ICE Deportation Dismissals Up to 20,000
ICE releases its latest statistics in its review of pending deportation cases. Of the 288,000 reviewed, 20,648 will be dismissed. ICE prosecutors in California also begin reviewing more than 18,000 pending deportation cases. 
June 12, 2012:  Obama Administration Sues Florida for its Effort to Remove Ineligible Voters
The Obama Administration files a lawsuit to prevent the State of Florida from removing ineligible voters, including illegal immigrants, from its voter registration rolls. On June 28, 2012, a federal court denies the Administration’s request, largely because Florida had abandoned its efforts, but also holds that a State is not prohibited from removing the names of noncitizens from its voter rolls, even within the 90-day “quiet” period before a federal election.
June 15, 2012:  President Obama Bypasses Congress and Unilaterally Implements His Version of Failed DREAM Act 
President Obama unilaterally implements provisions of the DREAM Act, circumventing Congress under the guise of “prosecutorial discretion.”  By executive fiat, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or “DACA” program grants amnesty and work authorizations to illegal immigrants under the age of 30 who claim they arrived in the country before the age of 16. ICE officers later report that this amnesty is being granted to adult illegal aliens who have been arrested for criminal offenses. In an interview the same day, Secretary Napolitano admits that DHS “internally set it up so that the parents are not referred for immigration enforcement if the young person comes in for deferred action,” thereby further expanding the scope of the non-enforcement directive. 
June 25, 2012:  Obama Administration Rescinds Arizona’s 287(g) Agreements in Retaliation for Supreme Court Upholding State Immigration Enforcement Law
Immediately following the Supreme Court’s decision upholding most of Arizona’s immigration enforcement law—which required law enforcement officers to take reasonable steps to verify the immigration status of those lawfully stopped or detained where there is reasonable suspicion to believe they are in the country illegally—the Administration rescinds all of its 287(g) agreements in Arizona.
July 6, 2012:  Obama Administration Announces Closure of Nine Border Patrol Stations
The Obama Administration announces the closure of nine Border Patrol stations throughout the country—Lubbock, Amarillo, Dallas, San Antonio, Abilene, and San Angelo, Texas; Billings, Montana; Twin Falls, Idaho; and Riverside, California. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman claims it is being done to more effectively use personnel. 
August 6, 2012:  Obama Administration Admits It Does Not Enforce Law Designed to Prevent Aliens from Relying on Public Welfare System
The Ranking Members of the Senate Budget, Judiciary, Finance, and Agriculture Committees request information from DHS and the State Department about visa denials after learning that only two of roughly 80 means-tested welfare programs were officially considered when evaluating whether an applicant for admission to the U.S. was likely to become a “public charge,” i.e., dependent on government assistance. Under Section 212 of the INA, an alien who is likely to become a public charge is inadmissible. On February 8, 2013, DHS finally responds that, in 2012, not a single immigrant was identified by the federal government as being a public charge, and that from FY2005 to FY2011, just 9,700 applicants for admission through the Visa Waiver Program out of more than 116 million were denied on public charge grounds. On March 1, 2013, the State Department finally responds with data showing that, in 2011, only 0.0033 percent of net applications for admission to the U.S. were denied on “public charge” grounds.
September 12, 2012:  Obama Administration Admits Aggressive Campaign to Recruit Immigrants to Sign-Up for U.S. Welfare Programs
In response to a request from the Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee, then-U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack admits that USDA personnel have conducted more than 30 meetings with the Mexican government to encourage non-citizen enrollment in food stamps and 14 other USDA-administered welfare programs. It is later revealed that a pamphlet distributed at Mexican consulates in the U.S. assures non-citizens that food stamp enrollment will not affect their path to citizenship, and that the USDA produced and broadcasted a soap opera-like “radio novela,” the premise of which included pressuring an individual to enroll in food stamps even though she insisted she could subsist without the benefits. 
October 4, 2012:  Obama Administration Ignores Los Angeles County’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Laws
The Obama Administration fails to take any action after Los Angeles Police Department Chief Charlie Beck announces that the LAPD will ignore requests by ICE to detain illegal immigrants arrested for “low-level” offenses.
December 21, 2012:  Morton Amnesty Memo #4
On the Friday before the Christmas holiday, ICE Director Morton issues a fourth memo with guidance on implementing executive amnesty, stating that ICE agents can no longer detain illegal immigrants if their only violation of the law is being in the country illegally. ICE agents now may detain only those who have committed a crime independent of their illegal presence, administratively suspending core elements of the INA.
January 22, 2013:  Obama Administration Files Brief in Support of Challenge to Arizona Law Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote
The Obama Administration files a brief in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., challenging Arizona’s law that requires individuals to provide evidence of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections. On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court holds that although federal law preempts the Arizona law, Arizona can still request that the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) include state-specific instructions on the federal form and a state may challenge a rejection of that request. Writing for the majority, Justice Scalia notes: “Arizona would have the opportunity to establish in a reviewing court that a mere oath will not suffice to effectuate its citizenship requirement and that the EAC is therefore under a nondiscretionary duty to include Arizona’s concrete-evidence requirement on the Federal form.”
February 14, 2013:  Obama Administration Announces It Has Approved Nearly 200,000 DACA Applications
USCIS releases its latest DACA statistics showing that the Administration has granted deferred action to 199,460 illegal immigrants under the program. 
February 26, 2013:  DHS Admits It Has No Metrics for Determining Whether Border Is Secure
GAO releases a report stating that DHS has no official metrics by which to determine whether the border is secure and has no plans to adopt any until late 2013. Since 2004, DHS had used “operational control” as a way to measure border security, and, in 2006, Congress mandated that DHS maintain operational control of the “entire international land and maritime borders of the United States.” After DHS reported in 2010 that it had operational control over only 13 percent of the 8,607 mile northern, southwestern, and coastal border, and only 44 percent operational control of the southwestern border specifically, the Obama Administration abandoned the metric. On March 21, 2013, the New York Times reports that Administration officials admitted that “they had resisted producing a single measure to assess the border because the president did not want any hurdles placed on the pathway to eventual citizenship for immigrants in the country illegally.”
February 2013:  Obama Administration Uses Sequester as Excuse to Release More Than 2,000 Illegal Immigrants—Including Illegal immigrants with Criminal Records—from ICE Custody
After reports surface that ICE had been releasing illegal immigrants in ICE custody due to the sequester, ICE Director Morton testifies before the House Judiciary Committee that ICE had, in fact, released 2,228 illegal immigrant detainees, at least 629 of whom had criminal records, contradicting earlier statements by DHS officials. Morton also admits that ICE had rearrested and brought back four of the most dangerous released detainees. According to the Associated Press, more than 2,000 had been released before the sequester even took effect and the Administration planned to release 3,000 more.  In October 2014, USA Today obtains internal ICE records contradicting the Administration’s assurances to Congress – including by White House spokesman Jay Carney – that those released had only minor criminal records. Morton had testified that none were charged or convicted with murder, rape or sexual abuse of a minor. However, according to the internal ICE documents, those freed had been charged with aggravated kidnapping, sexual assault (including of minors), drug trafficking, homicide, assaulting police officers, and weapons charges.
April 10, 2013:  Border Patrol Chief Testifies Apprehensions Have Increased
Chief of the Border Patrol Michael Fisher testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that there has been an increase in “attempted entries,” in part due to Congress’ consideration of amnesty.
April 23, 2013:  Federal Court Holds DHS Does Not Have Discretion to Stop Deportations
In Crane v. Napolitano, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas holds that “DHS does not have discretion to refuse to initiate removal proceedings [where the law requires it to do so].” The court also affirms that Congress, and not the President, has the plenary power to set immigration law and that the Obama administration’s non-enforcement policies violate federal law. The lawsuit originated when several ICE agents sued Secretary Napolitano, Director Morton, and Director Mayorkas, arguing that the Administration’s policies cause them to violate their oath of office to enforce the law.
April 24, 2013:  Attorney General Eric Holder Declares Amnesty Is a “Civil Right”
In a speech before the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Attorney General Eric Holder declares that amnesty is a “civil right”:  “Creating a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million unauthorized immigrants in this country is essential . . . This is a matter of civil and human rights.”
August 23, 2013:  Obama Administration Makes Broad New Category of Illegal Immigrants Eligible for Executive Amnesty
ICE announces a new policy prohibiting its agents from detaining and/or deporting illegal immigrant parents, legal guardians, and “primary caretakers” of minor children.  The policy memo states that ICE personnel “should ensure that the agency’s immigration enforcement activities do not unnecessarily disrupt the parental rights of both alien parents or legal guardians of minor children.” In response, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte states that the new directive “poisons the debate surrounding immigration reform and shows that the Administration is not serious about fixing our broken immigration system.”
October 5, 2013:  Obama Administration Ignores California’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law
California Governor Jerry Brown signs a law prohibiting state and local law enforcement from detaining illegal immigrants pursuant to an ICE detainer except in certain narrow circumstances. The bill is opposed by the California State Sheriffs Association and the California District Attorneys Association. To date, the Obama Administration has taken no action in response.
November 15, 2013:  Obama Administration Announces More Executive Amnesty
USCIS issues a new Policy Memorandum that employs a dubious interpretation of “parole in place”—a provision of law intended to allow aliens outside the U.S. to come into the country on a temporary and case-by-case basis under certain circumstances for humanitarian reasons at the discretion of the Attorney General. The Administration announces that it will now use this policy to grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrant immediate relatives of active and veteran members of the U.S. Armed Forces who are already inside the country. 
November 30, 2013:  Obama Administration Has Approved Over 500,000 DACA Applications
According information provided to congressional offices from USCIS, as of November 30, 2013, USCIS has received a total of 627,763 requests for DACA. Of the total, 509,926, or 81 percent, have been approved, while only 14,614, or 2 percent have been denied.
December 13, 2013:  Federal Court Rebukes DHS for Aiding Smugglers in Violating U.S. Laws
U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, Andrew S. Hanen, issues an order stating:  “This Court is quite concerned with the apparent policy of the Department of Homeland Security of completing the criminal mission of individuals who are violating the border security of the United States.” Judge Hanen details the practice of DHS immigration agents assisting human traffickers deliver illegal immigrants to their relatives in the United States—including relatives who are themselves illegal immigrants.
January 24, 2014:  New DHS Secretary, Jeh Johnson, Declares Illegal Immigrants Have “Earned the Right” to Become U.S. Citizens
In a speech to the U.S. Conference of Mayors, newly sworn-in DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson endorses a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants and states:  “It is also, frankly, in my judgment, a matter of who we are as Americans to offer those who want to be citizens, who’ve earned the right to be citizens . . . to have the opportunity that we all have to try to become American citizens.”
February 5, 2014:  Obama Administration Unilaterally Changes Federal Law Prohibiting Admission of Terrorists to U.S.
The Departments of Homeland Security and State publish new regulations to narrow a ban in the INA prohibiting individuals who had provided “limited” material support to terrorists from entering the country. The regulations would excuse activities such as:
committing or inciting to commit, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily injury, a terrorist activity; 
preparing or planning a terrorist activity; 
gathering information on potential targets for terrorist activity; 
soliciting funds or other things of value for terrorist activity; 
committing an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit, false documentation or identification, weapons (including chemical, biological, or radiological weapons), explosives, or training for the commission of a terrorist activity. 
Under the new administration policy, such individuals would be permitted not only to enter the country, but to apply for any immigration benefit, including permanent resident status.
February 8, 2014:  Obama Administration Diverts Resources to DACA Applications, Tripling Wait Times for Legal Immigrants
According to a report in the New York Times citing “administration officials and official data,” USCIS has diverted personnel and resources to processing DACA applications, tripling wait times for U.S. citizens petitioning for green cards for immediate relatives.  According to the report, “waits for approvals for those resident visas stretched to 15 months, and more than 500,000 applications became stuck in the pipeline, playing havoc with international moves and children’s schools and keeping families apart.”
February 11, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Audit Reveals Decline in Worksite Enforcement
According to a report by the DHS Inspector General, from 2009 to 2012, the Obama Administration systematically reduced fines levied against employers found in violation of the INA for employing illegal immigrants. The report states fines were reduced an average of 40 percent from $52.7 million to $31.2 million, and that of 1,174 final orders, 68 percent were reduced, 28 percent by more than half. The Inspector General states that such significant reductions “may diminish the effectiveness of fines as a deterrent to hiring unauthorized workers.”
March 4, 2014:  President Obama’s Annual Budget Request Cuts Enforcement Funding
President Obama’s FY2015 budget request proposes reducing overall funding for ICE by 4.5 percent, maintaining fewer detention beds, increasing alternatives to detention, and eliminating funding for the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP). His introductory budget message calls on Congress to pass amnesty.
March 12, 2014:  DHS Secretary Admits that Obama Administration Manipulates Deportation Statistics 
Testifying before the House Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee, Secretary Johnson admits that more than half of the 368,000 deportations reported by ICE for fiscal year 2013—touted as a record number of deportations—were actually due to arrests by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and would not have counted toward ICE’s removal totals under previous administrations.
March 13, 2014:  President Obama Announces Review of DHS Enforcement Practices
The President meets with Congressional Hispanic Caucus Leadership to discuss “their mutual efforts to pass commonsense immigration reform legislation through the House of Representatives this year.” A White House readout of the meeting notes that the President announced to those in attendance that he has directed Secretary Johnson to “do an inventory of the Department’s current practices to see how it can conduct enforcement more humanely within the confines of the law.”  
March 26, 2014:  Analysis of DHS Deportation Data Reveals Far-Reaching Defiance of Immigration Laws
According to ICE’s published data on 2013 removals, 98 percent of all removals met one of the agency’s “enforcement priorities”:  individuals who have been convicted of a serious criminal offense; those apprehended in the act of crossing the border; those who have been previously deported; and fugitives from the law. The first two categories—border apprehensions (which are not deportations as commonly understood) and convicted criminals—accounted for 94 percent of the 368,000 removals.  Less than 0.2 percent of the approximately 12 million illegal immigrants and visa overstays who did not have a serious criminal conviction were placed into removal proceedings; only .08 percent of the approximately 12 million were placed into removal proceedings who were neither convicted of a serious crime nor a repeat immigration violator. While there is no published tally of the .08 percent, reports from ICE officers indicate that these individuals likely had other security red flags on their records. Regardless, over 99 percent of illegal immigrants and visa overstays without known criminal records did not face removal.
March 26, 2014:  Obama Administration Releases Illegal Immigrants into Texas to Ease Overcrowded Detention Centers
Texas television station KRGV reports instances of women and minors claiming to have been recently released from immigration officials with “documents that allow [them] to travel anywhere in the United States.” The report claims that most individuals interviewed and released were of Central and South American origins other than Mexico. 
March 31, 2014:  New Report Reveals ICE Released 68,000 Convicted Criminals in 2013
A report released by the Center for Immigration Studies based on internal ICE data reveals that in 2013, ICE charged only 195,000, or 25 percent, out of 722,000 potentially deportable aliens they encountered, and released convicted criminal aliens 68,000 times. According to the data, more than 870,000 aliens who have been ordered removed remain in the country.
April 2, 2014:  CBP Commissioner Testifies Administration Policies Contribute to Recent Border Surge
On April 2, 2014, CBP Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske testifies before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security that Obama Administration polices—“deferred action, the family reunification, is an issue”—contributed to the recent border surge of unaccompanied alien minors and adults.
May 6, 2014:  Obama Administration Unilaterally Expands Guest Worker Admissions
DHS announces the publication of two proposed rules to give employment authorization to the spouses of certain H-1B workers, providing nearly 100,000 additional guest worker permits immediately and approximately 30,000 each year thereafter, and to loosen restrictions on other high-skill foreign workers. Meanwhile, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that majority of U.S. citizens with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) degrees do not work in STEM occupations.
May 8, 2014:  Obama Administration Revises Education Guidance Requiring “Equal Access” To Public Schools for Illegal Immigrants
Circumventing formal rulemaking processes that allow for public comment, the Departments of Justice and Education send a “Dear Colleague” letter to every public school district in the country regarding acceptable forms of student identification for illegal immigrants. The letter states that schools should not require commonly accepted forms of identification, such as “immigration papers,” Social Security numbers, a parent’s driver’s license, or state-issued identification, to establish residency in a district because illegal immigrants are less likely to have such identification and requiring such information could have a “chilling effect” on enrollment.
May 12, 2014:  Report Reveals ICE Released 36,007 Criminal Illegal Immigrants in 2013 
According to a report by the Center for Immigration Studies based on internal ICE data, ICE released 36,007 criminal illegal immigrants into U.S. communities in 2013 alone. These criminals had 88,000 convictions, including 193 homicide convictions, 426 sexual assault convictions, 303 kidnapping convictions, 9,187 dangerous drug convictions, and 16,070 drunk or drugged driving convictions.  
May 28, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces Plan to Bypass Congress to Permit DACA Recipients to Enlist in Military
According to a report in the New York Times, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel sent a letter to a group of Senators stating that he had “taken initial action to allow for the enlistment” of DACA recipients, creating an expedited pathway to citizenship in as little as three months. The plan would permit the individuals to apply under the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI) program, which currently allows legal immigrants with temporary visas to enlist if they have certain skills or speak certain languages.  Shortly thereafter, the President requests that the plan be delayed until August to give House Republicans a chance to pass amnesty legislation.
May 30, 2014:  Memo from Deputy Chief of U.S. Border Patrol Reveals Border Surge Incentivized by Obama Policies
A draft internal memorandum by Deputy Chief of the Border Patrol Ronald Vitiello warns the National Security Council’s trans-border security directorate that the border surge is worse than the Administration previously acknowledged and is “compromising” the government’s ability to combat other border threats.  Vitiello states: 
“Releasing other than Mexican family units, credible fear claims, and low-threat aliens on their own recognizance, along with facilitating family reunification of UAC in lieu of repatriation to their country of citizenship, serve as incentives for additional individuals to follow the same path. To stem the flow, adequate consequences must be delivered for illegal entry into the US and for facilitating human smuggling, either as a direct member of an illicit alien smuggling organization or as a private facilitator.  These consequences must be delivered both at the border and within the interior US, e.g. through expanded ICE Homeland Security Investigations to target individuals facilitating UAC and family unit travel to the US.”
June 5, 2014:  DHS Virtually Eliminates Education Requirements for DACA Renewal
Contrary to the publicly announced reasoning behind the DACA policy, guidance published by USCIS reveals that the agency will not require proof that individuals applying for DACA renewal graduated from an educational institution or are even continuing their studies. Also, many applicants will not have to include any supporting documentation at all.
June 20, 2014:  Obama Administration Officials Admit Rumors of Amnesty Fueled Border Surge 
White House Director of Domestic Policy Cecilia Muñoz says that “misinformation . . . is being deliberately planted by criminal organizations, by smuggling networks, about what people can expect if they come to the United States.” This contradicts statements by Muñoz in early June, when she denied that rumors of amnesty played a role in the surge:  “At least from our own anecdotal experience, from our federal agencies in talking with these children as they arrive, they appear to be unaware of the potential for any benefits. It seems to be quite clear that what’s driving this is what is happening in their home countries.”
July 2, 2014:  Border Patrol Union:  “It’s Open Season on Border Patrol Agents”
In an interview, National Border Patrol Council Vice President Shawn Moran states that conditions on the border are more dangerous than ever and that “[i]t seems that it’s open season on Border Patrol agents.” Moran warns:  “There are still people that are getting away—they are getting around us—and the cartels are managing this to their own advantage. And so, it is still a very dangerous place.” Moran states that agents are frustrated with pay cuts, lack of resources, “lip service” from Congress, and an official administration policy of “catch and release” for illegal immigrants that only encourages more illegal immigration:  “You cannot be complicit in getting people further into the United States by giving them bus tickets, giving them a notice to appear, when you know good and well that 80 percent-plus do not show up for these immigration hearings.”
July 5, 2014:  ICE Data Shows 80 Percent Decline in Deportations of Minors
According to a report in the Los Angeles Times, citing ICE data released pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request, deportations of minors fell from 8,143 in 2008 to 1,669 in 2013.
July 7, 2014:  Internal Government Intelligence Report Shows Administration Policy Behind Border Surge
According to a leaked report from the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), the widespread belief that illegal immigrants would receive “permisos” upon arriving at the U.S. border is the driving factor in the decision to come to the U.S. Below are key excerpts from the report:
“In late May, the U.S. Border Patrol interviewed unaccompanied children (UAC) and migrant families apprehended in the Rio Grande Valley. Of the 230 total migrants interviewed, 219 cited the primary reason for migrating to the United States was the perception of U.S. immigration laws granting free passes, or permisos, to UAC and adult female OTMs traveling with minors. Migrants indicated that knowledge of permisos was widespread across Central America due to word of mouth, local, and international media messaging—prompting many to depart for the United States within 30 days of becoming aware of these perceived benefits, according to the same reporting.”
“A majority of migrants interviewed also noted that they had encountered family units, consisting of a mother and child under the age of 18 during their journey to the United States and that the families had indicated they planned to surrender to U.S. authorities because they were informed that they would likely be released.”
“EPIC assesses homicide trends and migrant interviews suggest violence is likely not the principal factor driving the increase in UAC migration. While CBP data from early fiscal year 2011 indicates a steady increase in OTM and UAC migration, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) statistics—within this same timeframe—show a decline in per capita homicide rates in these three countries; El Salvador saw the sharpest decline, followed by Honduras and Guatemala, respectively.”
“Migrants cited Univision, Primer Impacto, Al Rojo Vivo and several Honduran television news outlets for helping shape their perception of U.S. immigration policy.”
“Although EPIC lacks reliable reporting of Central American newspapers broadcasting the perceived benefits of U.S. immigration policies, several U.S. media outlets since June 2014 have identified Central American newspapers that have enticed minors to travel to the United States. For example, Honduran and El Salvadoran press have reportedly advertised the DACA policy, accommodations for detained UAC, and the promise of reunification with family members in the United States.” 
“U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also notes that a large number of migrants interviewed claimed family members in the United States encouraged their travel because the U.S. government would cease issuing permisos after June 2014.”
“U.S. Border Patrol officials report that the majority of migrants interviewed in late May indicated that they made arrangements with smugglers in their respective countries through the assistance of family members and friends in the United States.”
“EPIC assesses that UAC flow to the border will remain elevated until migrants’ misperceptions about US immigration benefits are changed.” 
July 12, 2014:  Border Patrol Reassigned to Paperwork, Changing Diapers
According to National Border Patrol Council Vice President Shawn Moran, Border Patrol agents are routinely reassigned from their duties to changing diapers and babysitting. In an interview, Agent Hector Garza states that up 70 percent of agents have been reassigned from patrolling the border to handling paperwork related to the border surge. Former National Deputy Chief of Border Patrol Ronald Colburn tells National Review:  “It’s ironic that over the past decade we’ve doubled the staffing levels of sworn uniformed armed officer personnel, yet we now find them with their sleeves rolled up repairing vehicles, processing paperwork, answering phones, changing diapers, mixing formulas, playing badminton with children—they’re doing anything except patrolling the border. And [it’s] contrary to their own mission, but it’s out of their hands.”
July 14, 2014:  Asylum Approvals Increase Tenfold under Obama Administration
According to a report in the Daily Caller, leaked DHS data shows successful asylum claims almost tripled from 2012 to 2013, up to 30,393—ten times the number of approvals in 2008. 
July 16, 2014:  White House Cites “Privacy Rights” in Refusing To Release Location of Illegal Immigrants Relocated During Border Surge  
White House Spokesperson Josh Earnest refuses to answer questions regarding the relocation of illegal immigrants throughout the U.S., stating that the Administration would “abide by the privacy rights of particular individuals.”
July 19, 2014:  Report Reveals Obama Administration Had Advance Warning of Border Surge    
Contradicting administration claims that “nobody could have predicted the scale” of the border surge, the Washington Post reports that nearly a year earlier, DHS received a 41-page report (funded and supported by DHS’s Science and Technology Directorate) “rais[ing] alarms about the federal government’s capacity to manage a situation that was expected to grow worse.” In addition, Texas Governor Rick Perry had written to President Obama in May 2012, warning of such a crisis. According to the Post:  
“A person involved in the planning said that inside the White House, national security staffers were concerned about the growing influx of children but that the influential team of domestic policy advisers was far more focused on the legislative push. ‘Was the White House told there were huge flows of Central Americans coming? Of course they were told. A lot of times,’ said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. ‘Was there a general lack of interest and a focus on the legislation? Yes, that’s where the focus was.’”
July 21, 2014:  Agents Believe Administration Intentionally Handcuffing Them in Midst of Border Crisis; Fear Retaliation for Speaking Out 
According to former National Deputy Chief of the Border Patrol Ronald Colburn, some ICE officials believe “the Obama Administration has intentionally neglected to give them orders to support efforts to resolve” the border crisis. Colburn states:  
“They’re sitting still at their desks—reading newspapers, playing video games on their government computers—because they’re not being tasked with work, and they feel like it’s coming all the way down from the top.  These are guys that do want to go out more, but basically they’re not.”
Executive Vice President of the Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council and retired Border Patrol agent Dave Stoddard says all law enforcement agents are “terrified” of speaking out for fear of the consequences. One CBP email obtained by National Review warns that the punishment for leaking certain information to outside sources could result in up to 10 years in prison. Earlier in July, a Border Patrol agent received a cease and desist letter after speaking out about public health risks relating to transporting illegal immigrants. He later receives a formal reprimand.
August 11, 2014:  Department of Education Releases Fact Sheet about Illegal Aliens Being Entitled to Public Education
The Department of Education releases a Fact Sheet stating that all illegal immigrant minors are entitled to a publically-funded education. According to the FAQ section, “States and local educational agencies are obligated to provide all children—regardless of immigration status—with equal access to public education at the elementary and secondary level. This includes children such as unaccompanied children who may be involved in immigration proceedings.”
August 11, 2014:  Obama Administration Approves Rule to Reverse Longstanding Policy Banning Libyan Pilots and Nuclear Scientists from Training in U.S.
OMB approves a final regulation to lift a ban on permitting Libyan pilots and nuclear scientists to enter the U.S. to attend flight school, work in aviation maintenance or flight operations, or study or seek training in nuclear science. The ban had been put in place in 1983 after numerous terrorist attacks involving Libyans. Approximately a month later, on September 17, 2014, Secretary Johnson testifies before the House Homeland Security Committee that he did not intend to lift the ban “at this time.”
August 12, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Reveals ICE Released 2,211 Illegal Immigrants, Including 600 Criminal Aliens, in Early 2013
According to a DHS Inspector General report, ICE released 2,211 illegal immigrants in FY13, including 617 criminal aliens, purportedly in anticipation of budget cuts due to the sequester. The report states that ICE leadership decided to sharply reduce detention populations but did not inform the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of its planned releases:  “We were not able to determine why ICE executive leadership did not wait for OMB to make a decision on releasing additional funding.” According to the report, ICE leadership sent some of its field offices a target reduction number higher than their current detention population; did not provide written guidance on prioritizing releases or from which facilities to release them; did not formally notify ICE attorneys of the releases; and did not instruct field offices to track the releases. ICE leadership also did not provide Congress with accurate information on the number released for budgetary reasons. The report states that since the releases, 
“DHS transferred funding from other DHS components to fund detention bed space. Despite this transfer, [Enforcement and Removal Operations] officials said ICE executive leadership instructed them several times to increase detention populations and then release detainees. As a result, . . . ICE did not meet the [statutory] 34,000 mandate for FY 2013.”
August 16, 2014:  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Transfers Thousands of Unaccompanied Illegal Immigrant “Minors” with Gang Ties throughout U.S.
Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council Shawn Moran tells Fox News that MS-13 gang members are crossing the border and using Red Cross phones at detention facilities to coordinate gang activity. RGV Border Patrol Agent and Local 3307 Union Representative Albert Spratte tells CNSNews that many of the MS-13 gang members are adults but Border Patrol has to process them as minors if they claim to be under 18.
August 20, 2014:  Boston Becomes Sanctuary City
The Boston City Council unanimously passes the “Boston Trust Act,” which provides that the City will no longer hold illegal immigrants for federal authorities unless an arrest warrant has been issued. ICE spokesman Daniel Modricker refuses to address the ordinance, instead stating:  “When law enforcement agencies remand criminals to ICE custody rather than releasing them into the community, it helps contribute to public safety and the safety of law enforcement. To further this shared goal, ICE anticipates that law enforcement agencies will comply with detainers.”
August 21, 2014:  ICE Discloses Information on Location of Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Homicide and Released
In response to a letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Chuck Grassley, ICE discloses that of the 169 detainees with a “homicide-related conviction” released from custody in FY2013, 131 had been ordered deported. However, ICE does not specify how many, if any, actually have been deported. The letter provides the zip codes associated with the criminal aliens’ last known addresses.
August 22, 2014:  After Initial Denials, TSA Admits Illegal Immigrants Permitted to Board Planes without Identification 
After denying such accounts for over a month, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) admits that illegal immigrants are being permitted to board planes with no more than a “Notice to Appear” issued when they arrived in the U.S.  TSA had originally stated:  “These reports are false. A Notice to Appear, issued by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), is not an acceptable form of ID at the TSA checkpoint.” In a letter to Rep. Kenny Merchant (R-TX), however, TSA had admitted that if such an NTA is presented as identification, TSA will allow the passenger to board if TSA can corroborate the passenger’s identity though “DHS partner components.” 
August 25, 2014:  Report Reveals Border Surge Will Cost States $761 Million in Education Costs
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) releases a report, based on federal government data, indicating that more than 37,000 minors who were part of the border surge and have been transferred throughout the U.S. are eligible to attend public schools. The report states that 10 states make up the bulk of the cost at nearly $600 million:  New York, Texas, Maryland, California, New Jersey, Florida, Virginia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, and Georgia.
August 26, 2014:  Department of Justice Announces Victims of Domestic Violence in Guatemala May Qualify for Asylum in U.S.
Under the INA, individuals may seek asylum if they can show evidence of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a qualified “particular social group.” On August 26, 2014, the Department of Justice’s Board of Immigration Appeals rules that “‘married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship can constitute a cognizable particular social group that forms the basis of a claim for asylum or withholding of removal.” This ruling means that anyone who merely claims a history of domestic violence in a foreign country may be entitled to refuse to seek the assistance of local law enforcement, leave his or her country, and come to the United States indefinitely. 
August 27, 2014:  Obama Administration Enters into Settlement with ACLU Allowing Deported Illegal Immigrants to Return to U.S.
The Obama Administration enters into a settlement with the ACLU, which represents 9 Mexicans who claim they were “tricked” into agreeing to fast-track voluntary return deportation agreements between 2009 and 2013. Under the settlement, not only will the 9 individuals be able to return to the U.S. to challenge their deportations in court, but so too will anyone who deported voluntarily during that time period, which the ACLU estimates to be in the hundreds of thousands. Some argue that the agreement sets a legal precedent that could cover roughly 8.8 million illegal immigrants who were successfully deported under the same policy from 2001 to 2012. The settlement agreement also requires the U.S. to launch an outreach effort through Mexican media to inform deportees that they may be eligible to return if they are part of the settlement class. In addition, federal agents must advise illegal immigrants of their right to a hearing and provide them with access to an informational hotline and a list of free legal services providers.
August 28, 2014:  ICE Officers Ordered to Stay Away From Amnesty Rally in Front of ICE Headquarters
When 2,000 amnesty activists are expected at a CASA de Maryland rally in front of ICE Headquarters in Washington, D.C., Assistant Director Timothy Moynihan directs ICE personnel not to “engage in verbal or physical confrontation with participants.” An ICE officer speaking on the condition of anonymity says:
“We’re a big joke to these immigrant rights groups and the illegal immigrants know we’re not allowed to do anything. So basically, we have to use the back door and let activists, many who are illegal, stand in front of our building and protest the law. We have to sit there and watch, we have to suck it up and know that regardless of the law, groups like CASA can pretty much dictate policy and do whatever they want.”
August 29, 2014:  Over Six Months, 37,477 Unaccompanied Alien Minors Released, Only 280 Deported
HHS releases a report listing 126 counties throughout the U.S. where 29,890 unaccompanied alien minors have been transferred. Only 280 (0.9 percent) have been deported. 
August 29, 2014:  EEOC Signs Agreement with Mexican Government to Allow Mexican Nationals, Including Illegal Immigrants, to Exercise “Workplace Rights”
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enters into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Mexican government that states that the EEOC will provide education and training programs to inform Mexican Nationals about their workplace rights and to inform employers about compliance with anti-discrimination laws. EEOC General Counsel David Lopez says:  “This redoubles our efforts to ensure that the most vulnerable workers are protected by the laws – even those who live and work in the shadows.” 
September 2, 2014:  President Obama Declares Illegal Immigration to Be a “Right”
In a Labor Day speech in Milwaukee, President Obama declares that illegal immigration is a “right”:  “Hope is what gives young people the strength to march for women’s rights, and workers’ rights, and civil rights, and voting rights, and gay rights, and immigration rights.”
September 2, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces 18-Month Extension of Temporary Protected Status for Sudan and South Sudan
Secretary Johnson announces that Sudanese nationals are eligible for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for an additional 18 months, effective November 3, 2014, through May 2, 2016. TPS for Sudan was initially granted on May 3, 2013, and on September 2, 2014, for South Sudan. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify.  Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status. 
September 2, 2014:  Report Reveals that DHS Has Lost Track of More Than 6,000 Foreign Nationals on Student Visas of “Heightened Concern”
ABC News reports that DHS has lost track of more than 6,000 foreign nationals in the U.S. on student visas. According to the report, more than one million foreign students enter the U.S. each year. DHS’s own data show that 58,000 overstayed their student visas in the past year alone, of which 6,000 were referred to agents because they were determined to be of “heightened concern.” Approximately 40 percent of the estimated 11 to 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. are visa overstays. The article notes that closing loopholes in the student visa program was a major recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, “after it was determined that the hijacker who flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, had entered the U.S. on a student visa but never showed up for school.” The article states 9/11 Commission Chair Tom Kean “was stunned the federal government continues to lose track of so many foreign nationals who had entered the country with student visas.”
September 2, 2014:  Justice Department Sues Employer for Attempting to Ensure a Legal Workforce
The Justice Department announces a settlement with Culinaire International, which was alleged to have engaged in “citizenship discrimination” during the employment eligibility reverification process for requiring lawful permanent residents to produce new Permanent Resident Cards when their prior card expired. Under the settlement agreement, Culinaire will pay $20,460 in civil penalties, undergo training on the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA, establish a $40,000 back pay fund to “compensate potential economic victims,” revise its employment eligibility reverification policies, and be subject to federal government monitoring for 20 months.
September 3, 2014:  Obama Administration Conceals Continued Influx of Border Crossings
Despite the President’s claims during an August 28, 2014, press conference that border apprehensions in August are down from July and lower than the previous year, CBP records reveal the number of “family units”—adults and children crossing together—fell only slightly from 5,517 to 5,205. The President was likely referring only to the number of unaccompanied minors, which fell from 4,322 in July to 2,037 in August.
September 3, 2014:  Immigration Court Dates for Illegal Immigrants from Border Surge Years Away
Reports surface that immigration judges are setting court dates for recent border crossers as far into the future as 2018.
September 9, 2014:  Justice Department Rolls Back Operation Streamline
In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, Arizona Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake state that the Yuma County Sheriff’s Office has informed them that the U.S. Attorney for Arizona will no longer prosecute first-time border crossers under Operation Streamline—“a program seeking to reduce recidivism by expeditiously prosecuting those entering or reentering illegally under a ‘zero tolerance’ approach.” The letter notes that due in part to the program, “Yuma Sector’s border with Mexico has gone from being one of the busiest and most dangerous in the nation to one of the most secure.” To date, Holder has not responded.
September 11, 2014:  Report Reveals that U.S. Border Patrol Cannot Track Thousands of Released Illegal Immigrants
According to statement issued to Texas television station KRGV, government officials have no mechanism to keep track of illegal immigrants who fail to report to ICE after being released by the U.S. Border Patrol.  
September 12, 2014:  Associated Press Reports Deportations Lowest Since 2007
According to an analysis of DHS data by the Associated Press, the Obama Administration is on pace to remove the fewest number of illegal immigrants since 2007. The report also notes that “as of early September, only 319 of the more than 59,000 immigrants who were caught traveling with their families have been returned to Central America.”
September 12, 2014:  Despite Law Prohibiting Taxpayer-Funded Lawyers for Illegal Immigrants, Department of Justice Announces Millions in Legal Aid Grants for Unaccompanied Minors
The Department of Justice and the Corporation for National and Community Service announce $1.8 million in taxpayer-funded grants to “legal aid organizations to enroll approximately 100 lawyers and paralegals to represent children in immigration proceedings.”  However, under the INA, illegal immigrants are not entitled to taxpayer-funded representation in immigration proceedings.
September 17, 2014:  DHS Secretary Admits Amnesty Background Checks Would Miss Terrorists, Criminals
Testifying before the House Homeland Security Committee, Secretary Johnson admits that terrorists and criminals in the country illegally would not voluntarily undergo background checks.  
September 18, 2014:  USCIS Union President Says Administration’s Lax Policies Easily Exploited by Terrorists
In a statement, U.S. National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council President Ken Palinkas warns that terrorists can “exploit our loose and lax visa policies to gain entry to the United States.” Palinkas goes on to state:  
“Our caseworkers cannot even do in-person interviews for people seeking citizenship, they cannot enforce restrictions on welfare use, and they even lack the basic office space to properly function. Applications for entry are rubber-stamped, the result of grading agents by speed rather than discretion. We’ve become the visa clearinghouse for the world.”
September 19, 2014:  Internal CBP Document Reveals that 474 Illegal Immigrants from Terrorism-Linked Countries Apprehended in 2014 
An internal document from the CBP Office of Intelligence and Investigative Liaison reveals that 474 illegal immigrants from terrorism-linked countries were apprehended in 2014 alone. Since FY2009, almost 3,000 such individuals have been apprehended by Border Patrol attempting to enter the U.S. 
September 30, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Report Reveals Visa Security Program in Shambles
The DHS Inspector General releases a report stating that not only has DHS failed to fully implement the Visa Security Program (currently in less than 10 percent of all consular offices), but it is also unclear whether the program is effective, because the program is so poorly run. The program is supposed to stop terrorists and other bad actors from obtaining visas.
September 30, 2014:  Obama Administration Circumvents Congress and Creates New Central American In-Country Refugee Program
The State Department announces that parents who are “lawfully present” in the U.S. who have children living in El Salvador, Guatemala, or Honduras may request their child’s admission into the U.S. as a refugee—despite a lack of explanation as to how those children may constitute “refugees” as defined in the INA. Even when a child is not eligible for entry under the refugee program, they can still be considered for entry under a case-by-case parole program. Section 101 of the INA defines a refugee as a person “who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Courts have held that persecution requires government action, and that general violence or poverty does not meet the requirements for refugee or asylee status. Parole, commonly referred to as “humanitarian parole,” is authorized by Section 212 of the INA. The statute grants the Executive Branch discretion to “parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as [it] may prescribe only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.” While the administration acknowledges in its release that parole, by definition, is temporary in nature, it says aliens granted parole from Central America would be allowed into the U.S. in two-year increments and allowed to renew their parole, apparently indefinitely. It is later revealed that those granted deferred action, deferred enforced departure, and withhold of removal, will be eligible to participate. In effect, the program will allow “illegals in the United States to bring their children, their adult children, their grandchildren, and even step-parents into the United States.”
September 30, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces Plans to Accept Large Numbers of Syrian Refugees
According to statements delivered by the Assistant Secretary of State at a United Nations meeting in Geneva, the Obama administration expects the number of refugees entering the United States from Syria “to surge in 2015 and beyond.” The United States currently accepts 70,000 “displaced persons” a year, more than all the other countries in the world combined.  
October 1, 2014:  Despite Law Prohibiting Taxpayer-Funded Lawyers for Illegal Immigrants, HHS Announces Millions in Legal Aid for Illegal Immigrants
The Department of Health and Human Services announces that it will give $9.2 million to the Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Committee for Refugees and Immigrants to provide legal assistance to undocumented minors in deportation proceedings. Under federal law, illegal aliens are not entitled to government-funded representation in immigration proceedings.
October 4, 2014:  Obama Administration Continues to Ignore Growing Sanctuary Jurisdiction Problem
According to the Los Angeles Times, more than 225 local law enforcement agencies across the country have policies to completely ignore ICE detainer requests. Another 25 local law enforcement agencies limit the number of detainer requests they will honor.  In a statement to the Times, an ICE spokeswoman simply says that ICE will continue to work with local agencies “to enforce its priorities through the identification and removal of convicted criminals and other public safety threats.” According to an October 17, 2014, Fox News report, in the last nine months, 275 counties in 42 states have refused to honor ICE detainers. “In doing so, those jurisdictions have released some 9,000 [illegal immigrants] with criminal records who otherwise would have been removed from the U.S.”
October 6, 2014:  Obama Administration Solicits Bids for Contractors to Produce Millions of ID Cards Ahead of Executive Amnesty
USCIS posts a draft solicitation for bids for vendors capable of producing a “surge” of 9 million identification cards in one year and “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.” The solicitation states that USCIS will need a minimum of 4 million cards per year and estimates the maximum for the entire contract to be 34 million cards.  
October 7, 2014:  Report Reveals that Mexican Government Pays for Illegal Immigrants’ DACA Application Fees
A report from NPR reveals that Mexican consulates in the U.S. have been providing financial assistance for Mexican nationals to apply for DACA, including paying for all or part of the application costs and legal fees for lawyers. When asked why the Mexican government is spending money to help its citizens remain in the U.S., a spokesperson said the government’s “main objective is the well-being of our nationals wherever they are.”
October 9, 2014:  DHS Secretary Announces Increase in Border Apprehensions for Third Straight Year
Appearing before the Center for Strategic and International Studies, DHS Secretary Johnson announces that illegal immigration across the southern border has increased for the third straight year, reaching 479,377 apprehensions in FY2014. Although largely ignored by the media, Johnson admits that the influx of unaccompanied minors (68,541) was matched by an equally large influx of “family units” (68,445):  “A lot of the spike that we saw this summer were not just unaccompanied kids. Unaccompanied kids got the most attention. But a lot of it, perhaps on the same numbers, if not larger, were what we call family units—parents with kids.”
October 10, 2014:  Federal Employee Survey Shows DHS Morale Continues to Sink
The 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey reveals morale among DHS personnel continues to decline, and is among the lowest levels in the entire federal government, with only 41.6 percent of survey participants indicating they are satisfied with their employer. When DHS employees were asked on their views of their employers, only 24.9 percent had a positive response, with many also noting that leadership did not maintain high standards of honesty and integrity. 
October 13, 2014:  Reports Reveal that Obama Administration is Abusing Advance Parole to Allow DACA Recipients to Leave U.S. and Return without Consequences Mandated by Law
A local Arizona radio station reports, and it is later confirmed, that around 40 illegal aliens benefitting from the DREAM Act were issued “advanced-parole documents” that allowed them to visit Mexico and then immediately reenter the United States.  
October 15, 2014:  Report Reveals Further Collapse of Immigration Enforcement
A new report from the Center for Immigration Studies analyzing ICE records shows that immigration enforcement has continued to decline significantly in 2014. The report notes: 
Total deportations credited to ICE, the majority of which were arrests by Border Patrol and CBP officers at ports of entry, declined 15 percent from 2013 to 2014. 
Deportations from the interior dropped 34 percent from 2013 and are 58 percent lower than the peak in 2009.
The number of criminal aliens deported from the interior also declined 23 percent since 2013 and declined by 39 percent since the peak in 2011.
Catch-and-release policies continue: in 2014 deportation processing was initiated for only about 143,000 illegal immigrants out of the 585,000 encountered by agents. Tens of thousands of those let go by ICE had been labeled a criminal threat.
The number receiving a final order of removal but still in the U.S. has risen to nearly 900,000; nearly 160,000 are convicted criminals who were released by ICE and are currently at large.
October 16, 2014:  Obama Administration Extends Temporary Protected Status for Honduras and Nicaragua
Secretary Johnson extends the Temporary Protected Status of Honduran and Nicaraguan nationals to July 5, 2016. TPS for Honduras was initially granted on January 5, 1999, and for Nicaragua on March 9, 2001. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status. 
October 17, 2014:  President Obama Circumvents Congress and Creates New Program to Allow 109,000 Haitians to Enter U.S. Without Visas
USCIS announces a new Haitian Family Reunification Parole Program, which will waive visa waiting periods for family-based immigration visa applications. This program will permit an estimated 109,000 Haitians to enter and work in the U.S. up to two years earlier than they otherwise would have under current law, even though visas are not currently available. Under current law, visa applicants must wait in their home country until a visa becomes available. The President claims he has the power to do this under parole authority; however, as indicated elsewhere, parole was intended to be used for humanitarian purposes and on a case-by-case basis.
October 21, 2014:  USCIS Director Predicts Another Border Surge
Speaking at Georgetown University Law Center, USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez states that the administration is working to “prepare for another potential surge” at the border:  “In order to process individuals more efficiently at the border, the unaccompanied children presenting claims, we have had to redeploy, we’re also hiring more asylum officers. We have a lot of work to catch up.”
October 22, 2014:  DACA Recipients on North Carolina Voter Rolls
After the Division of Motor Vehicles runs a search for individuals with DACA driver’s licenses, the North Carolina State Board of Elections discovers that 145 DACA recipients are listed on state voter rolls.
October 22, 2014:  Justice Department Expands Legal Orientation Program to Assist Illegal Immigrants
The Justice Department announces that beginning November 1, 2014, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) will provide assistance to illegal immigrants detained at the Karnes Family Resident Center in Texas. Through the program, representatives from non-profit organizations provide explanations about immigration court procedures and other “basic legal information” to detained individuals.  The Justice Department announcement notes that “this expansion is possible due to additional funds Congress provided EOIR for the [program].” According to the announcement, since the start of FY2014, the program has expanded to seven additional sites and is currently at 32 sites across the country.
October 24, 2014:  Report Reveals Non-Citizen Voting in 2008 and 2010 Elections
A study by Professors Jesse Richman and David Earnest based on data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) reveals that “more than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted.”
October 26, 2014:  Internal DHS Report Reveals Suspected Terrorists Crossed Northern Border
According to a leaked DHS Intelligence Information Report, at least 13 men with terrorist ties have illegally entered the U.S. in one region of the U.S.-Canadian border since 2010.  The report also details that, as of September 9, 2014, there have been 155 encounters in the same area involving hundreds of individuals from special interest countries. 
October 27, 2014:  USCIS Union Pleads for Public’s Help in Stopping Executive Amnesty
In a statement, USCIS union president Ken Palinkas says:  
“[T]his statement is intended for the public: if you care about your immigration security and your neighborhood security, you must act now to ensure that Congress stops this unilateral amnesty. Let your voice be heard and spread the word to your neighbors. We who serve in our nation’s immigration agencies are pleading for your help—don’t let this happen. Express your concern to your Senators and Congressmen before it is too late. Whether it’s the failure to uphold the public charge laws, the abuse of our asylum procedures, the admission of Islamist radicals, or visas for health risks, the taxpayers are being fleeced and public safety is being endangered on a daily basis.”
October 31, 2014:  94 Percent of Illegal Immigrants from Border Surge Fail to Appear in Immigration Court
According to documents from the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), between July 18 and October 7, 2014, immigration judges handed down 3,885 decisions on removal cases with respect to “aliens” in family units—94 percent of which were made in absentia. Over that same time period, 9,874 cases were still pending. Of the 9,170 cases where individuals appeared before a judge, 7,330 were adjourned.
November 6, 2014:  Lawsuit Alleges ICE Leadership Pressured Prosecutors to Release Criminal Aliens
An award-winning career prosecutor and Chief of the Phoenix, Arizona ICE field office files a lawsuit against Secretary Johnson for retaliation after she resisted orders to release convicted criminal illegal aliens from ICE custody. The complaint highlights the Obama administration’s gross mismanagement of OPLA—including by high-ranking officials in OPLA, such as Peter Vincent, James Stolley, Matthew Downer, and Riah Ramlogan, some of whom were previously involved in directing a backdoor amnesty at the ICE Office of Chief Counsel in Houston. According to the complaint, ICE leadership directed its field offices not to take action against aliens with felony convictions, including an alien who registered to vote twice and claimed to be a U.S. citizen.
November 10, 2014:  President Obama Circumvents Congress and Announces Visa Agreement with China
President Obama announces a plan to extend the validity of Chinese tourist and business visas from one to ten years in exchange for identical extensions from China.  Student visas will also be extended from one to five years under the agreement.
November 10, 2014:  Apprehensions of Unaccompanied Minors Up 77 Percent in FY2014
According to CBP data, apprehensions of unaccompanied minors in FY2014 are up 77 percent, while apprehensions of family units are up 361 percent, compared to the previous year.
November 17, 2014:  Report Reveals Executive Amnesty Will Give Illegal Immigrants Access to Public Benefits
According to a report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), if the President uses “parole” or “deferred action” to circumvent Congress and grant amnesty, those individuals will be eligible for federal benefits such as Obamacare, unemployment benefits, Social Security, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, and TANF.
November 20, 2014:  President Obama Announces Executive Amnesty 
President Obama announces his “Immigration Accountability Executive Action,” unilaterally circumventing immigration law, including granting “deferred action” to approximately 5 million illegal immigrants. DHS issues 10 memos detailing the changes, such as ending the Secure Communities program and extending DACA to illegal immigrant parents of Americans and legal permanent residents. The White House issues two memoranda focusing on the immigrant visa system and integrating immigrants.  
November 20, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces Designation of Temporary Protected Status for Nationals from Ebola-Affected Countries
Secretary Johnson announces that nationals from Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone have been designated for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 months due to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status. 
November 24, 2014:  ICE Issues Agents Five-Point Checklist “For NOT Arresting/Removing Individuals”
ICE issues a 5-point questionnaire to its agents instructing them when not to deport someone under DHS’s expanded deferred action programs. Despite President Obama and Secretary Johnson’s promises that deportation will be handled on a case-by-case basis, the ICE checklist instructs agents to release any individual who meets the criteria.
November 25, 2014:  White House Admits Many Executive Amnesty Recipients Will Be Eligible for Social Security, Medicare, and Other Benefits
President Obama’s plan to provide amnesty for millions of illegal aliens will also provide federal benefits. In an e-mail from White House spokesman Shawn Turner to the Washington Post, Turner confirms that eligible illegal immigrants will be eligible to receive federal benefits like Social Security, Medicare, and survivor and disability benefits, among others.
November 25, 2014:  HHS Secretary Says Obamacare Enrollees Will Not Be Asked for Immigration Status
When asked if families with “mixed” immigration status will be eligible for Obamacare, Health and Human Services Secretary Burwell replies that “everyone should come on, and folks should not be scared. No questions will be asked, and it is not about an immigration issue.” When questioned about DACA recipients, however, Secretary Burwell suggests that they would remain ineligible, though she identifies no enforcement mechanism in the absence of questions about immigration status.
November 25, 2014:  President Obama Admits He Unilaterally “Took Action to Change the Law”
When questioned at a rally a few days after his executive action, President Obama admits that he unilaterally changed immigration laws. Prompted by pro-amnesty hecklers, Obama states:  “Now, you’re absolutely right that there have been significant numbers of deportations. That’s true. But what you are not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law.”
December 2, 2014:  DHS Still Cannot Determine Whether Border Is Secure 
Testifying before the House Homeland Security Committee, Secretary Johnson acknowledges that DHS still has not come up with metrics to measure border security:  “The Border Patrol has metrics and I’ve asked that they improve upon that.”
December 3, 2014:  DHS Announces 1,000 Job Openings, New Office Space in Preparation for Processing of Executive Amnesty 
While simultaneously claiming that deferred action in deporting illegal aliens is primarily due to a lack of resources, USCIS lists around 1,000 new job openings at an operational center Arlington, Virginia. The primary purpose of these new jobs is to process and carry out the President’s November 2014 executive actions. Salaries for these positions are listed as high as $157,000.  
December 3, 2014:  26 States File Lawsuit Challenging Obama’s Executive Amnesty
Eighteen states file a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Texas challenging the President’s unilateral action on immigration.  As of February 6, 2015, 26 states are parties to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that the President’s actions violate his duty under the Constitution’s Take Care Clause.  
December 4, 2014:  ICE Report Shows 23 Percent Drop in Removals since FY2012; Release of 30,862 Convicted Criminals
ICE’s FY2014 Enforcement and Removal Operations report reveals that removals fell by over 14 percent as compared to 2013, and 23 percent as compared to 2012. Furthermore, of the 315,943 illegal immigrants removed from the country, less than one-third were apprehended in the interior. The report also indicates that over 1,000 of those apprehended were from countries known to have links to terrorism, and that more than 30,000 convicted criminals had been released from federal custody.
December 8, 2014:  ICE E-Mails Detail Plans to Drop Questions About Criminal History from Immigration Application 
Internal DHS documents reveal that immigrants applying for visas as victims of human trafficking or other criminal activity might be exempted from answering questions about their own criminal history. These were key areas targeted for immigration expansion in President Obama’s amnesty action, and may serve as loopholes for dangerous criminals seeking to enter the U.S.
December 9, 2014:  President Obama States Illegal Immigrants “Are Not Going to Be Deported”
President Obama admits to a group of illegal immigrants that his executive action would serve as de facto amnesty for nearly all of the 11 million illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. Obama acknowledges that the vast majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. are “low priority,” and that anyone in the “low priority” range will not be deported. This contradicts his earlier statement that his unilateral actions would affect only around 5 million people.
December 9, 2014:  USCIS Director Claims Executive Action Meant to Make Illegal Aliens Impossible to Deport Later
USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez states that one of the purposes of the executive amnesty is to ensure that future presidents “cannot so easily by fiat now remove those people from the economy.” Rodriguez also suggests that there would be “dire economic consequences” if the federal government sought to deport more illegal aliens, and that this was “one of the major reasons why they haven’t been removed.” This contradicts DHS’s position that the President’s actions are required because DHS lacks adequate resources.
December 18, 2014:  After Executive Action, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio Disbands Illegal Immigration Identity Theft Unit 
Noting that the President’s unlawful executive amnesty will permit many illegal immigrants to work in the U.S., Sheriff Arpaio disbands his identity theft unit. The unit had raided 83 businesses and charged more than 700 illegal immigrants with using fake or stolen identities.
December 19, 2014:  DHS Year-End Statistics Reveal Increase in Illegal Immigration, Decrease in Deportations
According to DHS data released just before the Christmas holiday, border apprehensions increased 16 percent in FY2014 while deportations from the interior of the U.S. fell by 24 percent. ICE deported only 315,000 immigrants in FY 2014, 45,000 less than 2013 and 95,000 less than 2012. The drop in interior removals was even more drastic as ICE deported only 102,000 illegal immigrants from the interior of the U.S., which is the lowest number of interior removal since 2006.  
December 19, 2014:  Report Reveals 91 Percent of Illegal Immigrants from Border Surge Have Absconded
According to a report from local Houston news outlet examining information from the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), very few illegal immigrants have been repatriated to their home countries. The vast majority—91 percent—have absconded after being released and are no longer a priority under the Administration’s “prosecutorial discretion” policies. Following on this report, the Center for Immigration Studies releases an analysis that shows:
The number of family units arriving illegally was larger than the number of UACs during this time period, although the administration, its allies, and the media typically described the surge as an influx of children.
At least 92 percent of the family unit arrivals in this sample of cases were released after apprehension rather than detained in the border area.
Nearly all of those released (5,575 out of 6,093 total families and UACs, or 91 percent) subsequently failed to appear at their immigration hearings and are now part of the illegal population.
According to these figures, 43 percent of those family members classified as “detained” (nine people) also failed to appear for their hearings, suggesting that they actually were released at some point.
Even under the current very generous interpretations of immigration law, only 3 percent of these illegal aliens were found qualified to stay in the United States (204 out of 6,093 completed cases).
Only 314 of the 6,093 cases completed (5 percent) were present for their hearing and could actually be removed by authorities after receiving the order from the judge.
December 23, 2014:  HHS Seeks Shelter and Childcare Capacity in Preparation for Possible 2015 Border Surge 
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) posts a solicitation for bids in preparation for a surge of unaccompanied minors in 2015. The post seeks to develop contract options for temporary structures to serve as shelters for 100 to 2,500 children as well as “other related services.”  
December 24, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Report Reveals CBP Drone Program to Be Ineffective
An audit by DHS’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) finds that a drone surveillance system deployed by DHS “has not developed performance measures” and “has also not achieved the expected results.  According to the OIG report, CPB drones focused on about 170 miles (less than 10 percent) of the entire U.S. southern border.  The OIG estimates that it cost over $12,000 to support approximately 5,100 drones per hour in the air, compared to CBP’s estimate of approximately $2,100 per flight hour.
December 29, 2014:  Border Patrol Notes Illegal Border Crossers Becoming More Aggressive
President of the Tucson Border Patrol Local union Art Del Cueto states in an interview:  “In recent years, undocumented immigrants’ aggressiveness has increased and that is something we face when we patrol the desert.” 
January 3, 2014:  Oversight Report Shows 700 Miles of Southern Border Remain Unprotected
The final oversight report issued by then-Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ranking Member Tom Coburn reveals that 700 miles of the Southern border remain unsecured. The report further reveals that only 3 percent of illegal immigrants will ever be deported and that there is “little or no border security coverage for thousands of miles” of the northern U.S. border. 
January 5, 2015:  Administration Announces 18-Month Redesignation of Temporary Protected Status for Syria
Secretary Johnson announces that the administration is re-designating Syria for Temporary Protected Status (TPS), extending the current designation from April 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016. The redesignation will allow eligible Syrian nationals (or those who last habitually resided in Syria) to register for TPS for the first time and the extension will allow current beneficiaries to extend their TPS. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible.  Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status. 

January 6, 2015:  Over 1,000 Illegal Immigrants from Countries with Terrorism Ties Apprehended in FY2014
According to CBP data, agents apprehended 1,191 individuals from 12 of the 14 countries that the Departments of Homeland Security and State have designated as state sponsors of terror or  “countries of interest,” which are countries designated by the government to have terrorist links. The 12 countries are Iran, Sudan, Cuba, and Syria (state sponsors of terror), and Afghanistan, Algeria, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Yemen (“countries of interest”).
January 7, 2015:  Obama Administration Extends Temporary Protected Status for El Salvador
Secretary Johnson extends the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for El Salvadoran nationals for an additional 18 months, effective March 10, 2015, through Sept. 9, 2016.  TPS for El Salvador was initially granted on March 9, 2001. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status. 
January 8, 2015:  CBP Reports Increase in Aliens Attempting to Enter U.S. with False Papers
According to reports, there was a 25 percent increase in “inadmissibles,” or, people that were denied entry or detained at Texas ports of entry in FY2014. CBP notes that most of those were attempting to use fraudulent documents or documents that belonged to someone else.  
January 11, 2015:  After President’s Executive Action, Border Patrol Agents Instructed Not to Focus on Majority of Illegal Immigrants in U.S. 
Leaked CBP training documents reveal that Border Patrol agents have been ordered not to enforce immigration laws against the vast majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. The guidance is meant to inform CBP employees about the changes that the President’s executive will have on DHS’s enforcement priorities. Each agent involved in implementing the President’s executive actions will be required to undergo additional training.
January 13, 2015:  President Obama Unilaterally Establishes Diplomatic Relations with Cuba, Resulting in Immigrant Surge
After President Obama unilaterally establishes diplomatic relations with Cuba, there is a dramatic increase in the number of Cubans attempting to enter the U.S. According to the Washington Times, records shared with Congress show that “the Coast Guard interdicted more than 340 Cubans in the final two weeks of December, more than double the 140 who came in the first half of the month” prior to the President’s announcement. 144 Cubans were apprehended in the first week of January 2015.  Other reports note that the policy changes will require major changes to border security strategies.
January 14, 2015:  Mexican Government Announces It Will Provide Illegal Immigrants in U.S. with Birth Certificates
The Mexican government announces it will start issuing birth certificates to its citizens at consulates in the U.S. to make it easier for them to apply for work permits, driver’s licenses, and executive amnesty. Jessica Vaughan with the Center for Immigration Studies notes that such actions facilitate remittances to Mexico.
January 15, 2015:  Justice Department Sues Employer for Attempting to Ensure a Legal Workforce
The Justice Department announces a settlement with U.S. Service Industries (USSI), which was alleged to have violated the INA by discriminating against work-authorized individuals who are not U.S. citizens by requiring those individuals to produce documents issued by DHS as a condition of employment. Under the settlement agreement, USSI will pay $132,000 in civil penalties, undergo training on the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA, establish a $50,000 back pay fund to “compensate any workers who may have lost wages,” revise its employment eligibility verification policies, and be subject to federal government monitoring for two years.
January 15, 2015:  CBO Confirms Illegal Immigrants Granted Executive Amnesty Eligible for Federal Benefits
CBO releases a report finding that by 2017, two million additional illegal immigrants will be eligible for federal benefits under the Obama Administration’s executive amnesty plan. The report states that, over the next 10 years, the amnesty will cost over $10.2 billion in Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit payouts; $1.8 billion in Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare subsidies; $1 billion in SSI; and $800 million in SNAP. CBO warns that long-term “federal spending would increase significantly,” with costs for Social Security and Medicare becoming much greater outside of the 10-year budget window analyzed in the agency’s report—the time period during which newly amnestied individuals would begin paying payroll taxes but not yet claiming benefits. In a December 1, 2014, Investor’s Business Daily article, Merrill Matthews, resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation in Dallas, and Mark E. Litow, retired actuary and past chairman of the Social Insurance Public Finance Section of the Society of Actuaries, conclude similarly that while the government will receive about $500 billion in payroll tax revenue as a result of the amnesty, it will pay out some $2 trillion in Social Security and Medicare benefits over several decades.
January 28, 2015:  Obama Administration Orders Agents to Find Illegal Immigrants Eligible for Executive Amnesty
The Associated Press reports that internal DHS training documents direct immigration agents to ask illegal immigrants they encounter whether they might qualify for executive amnesty and to review government files to identify any jailed illegal immigrants who might be eligible for release under the program.
January 30, 2015:  USCIS Announces It Will Begin Accepting Requests for Expanded DACA on February 18, 2015 Pursuant to Executive Amnesty
USCIS announces that it will begin accepting requests for expanded DACA on February 18, 2015, pursuant to the President’s executive amnesty. Under the new guidelines, people of any current age who entered the country before age 16 and have lived in the U.S. since January 1, 2010, may now apply.
January 30, 2015:  1,000 Criminal Aliens Released by ICE in FY2013 Re-Offend
According to a 38-page DHS document provided to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, of the 36,007 criminal aliens released from ICE custody in FY2013, 1,000 have since been convicted of new crimes, including:  assault with a deadly weapon; terroristic threats; failure to register as a sex offender; lewd acts with a child under 14; aggravated assault; robbery; hit and run; criminal street gang activity; rape of spouse by force; and child cruelty involving possible injury/death.
February 2, 2015:  Government Data Reveals Obama Administration Issued 7.4 Million Work Permits Since 2009 In Excess of Established Levels
A Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Center for Immigration Studies unearths government data revealing that the Obama Administration issued more than 7.4 million work permits to aliens from 2009 to 2014, beyond that which is authorized by statute.   That includes 4.7 million new Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) and 2.7 million renewals of expired EADs.  According to the published data, this includes 2.2 million EADs for unlawful entrants or those unqualified for admission, 547,000 individuals here on tourist visas, 593,000 foreign students who are supposed to be subject to strict restrictions, and 37,000 individuals who arrived through the Visa Waiver Program.   Crucially, these EADs are in addition to and beyond the existing annual grant of approximately 1 million permanent residency or green cards to mostly lesser-skilled legal immigrants and 700,000 foreign guest workers.
February 4, 2015:  Former USCIS Official Testifies Executive Amnesty Could Overwhelm Agency
The former deputy ombudsman for USCIS, Luke Bellocchi, testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that it is “hard to imagine” that USCIS can handle the increase in new applications from the President’s executive amnesty. Bellocchi testified that USCIS’s processing system is paper-based and will likely have to divert resources from other immigration applications to handle the executive amnesty.
February 6, 2015:  DHS Announces Hotlines for Illegal Immigrants to Lodge Complaints Against Immigration Enforcement Officers Who “Violate” New Amnesty Policy
CBP announces a hotline for illegal immigrants “wishing to submit a formal complaint pertaining to an encounter with a Customs and Border Protection Officer or Border Patrol Agent.” Prior to the announcement, DHS had alerted “stakeholders” of three such hotlines for CBP, ICE, and USCIS. Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council Shawn Moran responds, stating “[i]nstead of supporting our agents, this administration has decided it is more important to find new ways to solicit complaints and invite ridicule against them. We demand that this administration spend more time defending the men and women defending our nation and less time promoting the extreme agendas of pro-illegal-immigration organizations.” Moran suggests DHS set up a complaint line for agents to register concerns regarding the Obama Administration’s failure to enforce the law.
February 13, 2015:  House Judiciary Chairman Reveals Administration Granting DACA Recipients a Pathway to Citizenship 
House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte sends a letter to Secretary Johnson regarding the Administration’s announcement on a call with Congressional offices that it will permit illegal immigrants to simultaneously apply for both DACA and advance parole. Advance parole allows illegal immigrants to re-enter the United States after leaving the country, at which point they may be eligible to adjust their immigration status and be placed on a pathway to citizenship.